From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253E8A04F6;
	Sat, 21 Dec 2019 19:09:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7CB1C01;
	Sat, 21 Dec 2019 19:09:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-pf1-f193.google.com (mail-pf1-f193.google.com
 [209.85.210.193]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233091252
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 19:09:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pf1-f193.google.com with SMTP id x185so7016463pfc.5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 10:09:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=IhJehQkZJcYu20CCfltrqkxJWw9zvVMgrn/yAgkvK+M=;
 b=TDWddwEVQSsBLdB7vpzzwU73PQ1MiV0ot3uWDjhQdC60wm4rsLUHC4INvm0Ag1ki36
 kIsLAWkdhrV84Vw+4GeD3ujgxDk9OYIlGrfwt0in6+73Va+rEoPQF7Olse9m5pmu1lvt
 QKvfbje0xu6cQHtQW3h5GcZ+XCllA6STVQmww0leU0Gwqm1b41X5+0Etnpoc8oHRhRrI
 vZW+3MDjRtC1GizvWaYnsdRzcCdMuWUfAeYhLU35t+9RJtqizW2hPzXosG00aosXj+lm
 jY0EICgh23LaZW0ill1R91di25/62opI467RY9re68PDVcO5F7ne+jOSJwcRFWrx+mHw
 Lx4A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=IhJehQkZJcYu20CCfltrqkxJWw9zvVMgrn/yAgkvK+M=;
 b=NI06Zm/WEwdIgtBd1VVsPdCGAGLuLAqz+uA9yvgSweGLiHUpIhOYUlpro/fOV80zWo
 zxHXkbR4BDYskiy7rlVGLGAsh/3PKQSu7skpBXviOBrzOUnlrlUmc9kQnHB1nFVimI+7
 yDOt56/VfyL5oWE3xdsloFEJiPcvANKRQxfPPZ33J/X47ZY+xBBlNGw05E3NI0XOCW1U
 FX5AOT/4MFoUGYR//bu6yFDt9H3cMK75FvBvXu3w0xFghPoVWzNed10Bt8MTv2Nlqb8A
 WIvZcvlrHLS5QVK16qEkiSvn3VUxNl+Ie3YBxwi28akwkGLbK7+rrKnO8+jN+rsBSqvg
 2dGg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV+sGhqv7L3HYRTZ2EAKz7b+V6gK9K8okTOnnaenS+6MxMWL72U
 +PzEMAtbSotUmlWs8l/qvWvnqQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzb9aYRH/tshM1Xxl1mgOf0Jq3u1XmXPO6HgzmlUoiBOHePj84o3dAkkVTRlK3HkV7oSqxU0g==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8283:: with SMTP id s3mr23240882pfm.106.1576951739348; 
 Sat, 21 Dec 2019 10:08:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m128sm17218784pfm.183.2019.12.21.10.08.58
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Sat, 21 Dec 2019 10:08:59 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 10:08:56 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
Cc: Joyce Kong <Joyce.Kong@arm.com>, "thomas@monjalon.net"
 <thomas@monjalon.net>, "david.marchand@redhat.com"
 <david.marchand@redhat.com>, "mb@smartsharesystems.com"
 <mb@smartsharesystems.com>, "jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
 "bruce.richardson@intel.com" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 "ravi1.kumar@amd.com" <ravi1.kumar@amd.com>, "rmody@marvell.com"
 <rmody@marvell.com>, "shshaikh@marvell.com" <shshaikh@marvell.com>,
 "xuanziyang2@huawei.com" <xuanziyang2@huawei.com>,
 "cloud.wangxiaoyun@huawei.com" <cloud.wangxiaoyun@huawei.com>,
 "zhouguoyang@huawei.com" <zhouguoyang@huawei.com>, Phil Yang
 <Phil.Yang@arm.com>, Gavin Hu <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
 "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Message-ID: <20191221100856.5ebfce01@hermes.lan>
In-Reply-To: <VE1PR08MB5149B57BCC162BF4317EFB4D982C0@VE1PR08MB5149.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
References: <1571125801-45773-1-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com>
 <1576648808-24765-2-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com>
 <VE1PR08MB514950694BD1532A840ABA9B982D0@VE1PR08MB5149.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
 <VE1PR08MB5149B57BCC162BF4317EFB4D982C0@VE1PR08MB5149.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of rte
 bit operation APIs
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Sat, 21 Dec 2019 16:07:23 +0000
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote:

> Converting these into macros will help remove the size based duplication of APIs. I came up with the following macro:
> 
> #define RTE_GET_BIT(nr, var, ret, memorder) \
> ({ \
>     if (sizeof(var) == sizeof(uint32_t)) { \
>         uint32_t mask1 = 1U << (nr)%32; \
>         ret = __atomic_load_n(&var, (memorder)) & mask1;\
>     } \
>     else {\
>         uint64_t mask2 = 1UL << (nr)%64;\
>         ret = __atomic_load_n(&var, (memorder)) & mask2;\
>     } \
> })


Follow on if you want to do it as macros, then use typeof() to make the
mask any size.