DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, matan@mellanox.com, rasland@mellanox.com,
	orika@mellanox.com, shahafs@mellanox.com,
	stephen@networkplumber.org, thomas@mellanox.net
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/5] mbuf: detach mbuf with pinned external buffer
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 14:56:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200120135607.GI14387@glumotte.dev.6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1579179869-32508-3-git-send-email-viacheslavo@mellanox.com>

Hi Slava,

Some comments inline.

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 01:04:26PM +0000, Viacheslav Ovsiienko wrote:
> Update detach routine to check the mbuf pool type.
> Introduce the special internal version of detach routine to handle
> the special case of pinned external bufferon mbuf freeing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> index e9f6fa9..52d57d1 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> @@ -323,6 +323,24 @@ struct rte_pktmbuf_pool_private {
>  	return mbp_priv->flags;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * When set pktmbuf mempool will hold only mbufs with pinned external

few minor doc enhancements:

-When set pktmbuf...
+When set, pktmbuf...


> + * buffer. The external buffer will be attached on the mbuf at the

-attached on
+attached to

> + * memory pool creation and will never be detached by the mbuf free calls.
> + * mbuf should not contain any room for data after the mbuf structure.
> + */
> +#define RTE_PKTMBUF_POOL_F_PINNED_EXT_BUF (1 << 0)
> +
> +/**
> + * Returns non zero if given mbuf has an pinned external buffer, or zero

-an
+a


> + * otherwise. The pinned external buffer is allocated at pool creation
> + * time and should not be freed on mbuf freeing.
> + *
> + * External buffer is a user-provided anonymous buffer.
> + */
> +#define RTE_MBUF_HAS_PINNED_EXTBUF(mb) \
> +	(rte_pktmbuf_priv_flags(mb->pool) & RTE_PKTMBUF_POOL_F_PINNED_EXT_BUF)
> +
>  #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_MBUF_DEBUG
>  
>  /**  check mbuf type in debug mode */
> @@ -588,7 +606,8 @@ static inline struct rte_mbuf *rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(struct rte_mempool *mp)
>  static __rte_always_inline void
>  rte_mbuf_raw_free(struct rte_mbuf *m)
>  {
> -	RTE_ASSERT(RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(m));
> +	RTE_ASSERT(!RTE_MBUF_CLONED(m) &&
> +		  (!RTE_MBUF_HAS_EXTBUF(m) || RTE_MBUF_HAS_PINNED_EXTBUF(m)));
>  	RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m) == 1);
>  	RTE_ASSERT(m->next == NULL);
>  	RTE_ASSERT(m->nb_segs == 1);
> @@ -794,7 +813,7 @@ static inline void rte_pktmbuf_reset(struct rte_mbuf *m)
>  	m->nb_segs = 1;
>  	m->port = MBUF_INVALID_PORT;
>  
> -	m->ol_flags = 0;
> +	m->ol_flags &= EXT_ATTACHED_MBUF;
>  	m->packet_type = 0;
>  	rte_pktmbuf_reset_headroom(m);
>  
> @@ -1158,11 +1177,26 @@ static inline void rte_pktmbuf_detach(struct rte_mbuf *m)
>  	uint32_t mbuf_size, buf_len;
>  	uint16_t priv_size;
>  
> -	if (RTE_MBUF_HAS_EXTBUF(m))
> +	if (RTE_MBUF_HAS_EXTBUF(m)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * The mbuf has the external attached buffer,
> +		 * we should check the type of the memory pool where
> +		 * the mbuf was allocated from to detect the pinned
> +		 * external buffer.
> +		 */
> +		uint32_t flags = rte_pktmbuf_priv_flags(mp);
> +
> +		if (flags & RTE_PKTMBUF_POOL_F_PINNED_EXT_BUF) {
> +			/*
> +			 * The pinned external buffer should not be
> +			 * detached from its backing mbuf, just exit.
> +			 */
> +			return;
> +		}
>  		__rte_pktmbuf_free_extbuf(m);
> -	else
> +	} else {
>  		__rte_pktmbuf_free_direct(m);
> -
> +	}

This new behavior could be documented in the API of detach(). I mean
something saying that an ext mem pinned mbuf cannot be detached, and
the function will do nothing.

>  	priv_size = rte_pktmbuf_priv_size(mp);
>  	mbuf_size = (uint32_t)(sizeof(struct rte_mbuf) + priv_size);
>  	buf_len = rte_pktmbuf_data_room_size(mp);
> @@ -1177,6 +1211,51 @@ static inline void rte_pktmbuf_detach(struct rte_mbuf *m)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> + * @internal version of rte_pktmbuf_detach() to be used on mbuf freeing.

-version
+Version

> + * For indirect and regular (not pinned) external mbufs the standard
> + * rte_pktmbuf is involved, for pinned external buffer mbufs the special
> + * handling is performed:

Sorry, it is not very clear to me, especially what "the standard
rte_pktmbuf is involved" means.

> + *
> + *  - return zero if reference counter in shinfo is one. It means there is
> + *  no more references to this pinned buffer and mbuf can be returned to

-references
+reference

> + *  the pool
> + *
> + *  - otherwise (if reference counter is not one), decrement reference
> + *  counter and return non-zero value to prevent freeing the backing mbuf.
> + *
> + * Returns non zero if mbuf should not be freed.
> + */
> +static inline uint16_t __rte_pktmbuf_detach_on_free(struct rte_mbuf *m)

I think int would be better than uint16_t

> +{
> +	if (RTE_MBUF_HAS_EXTBUF(m)) {
> +		uint32_t flags = rte_pktmbuf_priv_flags(m->pool);
> +
> +		if (flags & RTE_PKTMBUF_POOL_F_PINNED_EXT_BUF) {
> +			struct rte_mbuf_ext_shared_info *shinfo;
> +
> +			/* Clear flags, mbuf is being freed. */
> +			m->ol_flags = EXT_ATTACHED_MBUF;
> +			shinfo = m->shinfo;
> +			/* Optimize for performance - do not dec/reinit */
> +			if (likely(rte_mbuf_ext_refcnt_read(shinfo) == 1))
> +				return 0;
> +			/*
> +			 * Direct usage of add primitive to avoid
> +			 * duplication of comparing with one.
> +			 */
> +			if (likely(rte_atomic16_add_return
> +					(&shinfo->refcnt_atomic, -1)))
> +				return 1;
> +			/* Reinitialize counter before mbuf freeing. */
> +			rte_mbuf_ext_refcnt_set(shinfo, 1);
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	rte_pktmbuf_detach(m);
> +	return 0;
> +}

I don't think the API comment really reflects what is done in this
function. In my understanding, the detach() operation does nothing
on an extmem pinned mbuf. So detach() is probably not the proper name.

What about something like this instead:

/* [...].
 *  assume m is pinned to external memory */
static inline int
__rte_pktmbuf_pinned_ext_buf_decref(struct rte_mbuf *m)
{
	struct rte_mbuf_ext_shared_info *shinfo;

	/* Clear flags, mbuf is being freed. */
	m->ol_flags = EXT_ATTACHED_MBUF;
	shinfo = m->shinfo;

	/* Optimize for performance - do not dec/reinit */
	if (likely(rte_mbuf_ext_refcnt_read(shinfo) == 1))
		return 0;

	/*
	 * Direct usage of add primitive to avoid
	 * duplication of comparing with one.
	 */
	if (likely(rte_atomic16_add_return
			(&shinfo->refcnt_atomic, -1)))
		return 1;

	/* Reinitialize counter before mbuf freeing. */
	rte_mbuf_ext_refcnt_set(shinfo, 1);
	return 0;
}

static __rte_always_inline struct rte_mbuf *
rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(struct rte_mbuf *m)
{
	__rte_mbuf_sanity_check(m, 0);

	if (likely(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m) == 1)) {

		if (!RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(m))
			if (!RTE_MBUF_HAS_PINNED_EXTBUF(m))
				rte_pktmbuf_detach(m);
			else if (__rte_pktmbuf_pinned_ext_buf_decref(m))
				return NULL;
		}
		...
	... (and same below) ...


(just quickly tested)

The other advantage is that we don't call rte_pktmbuf_detach() where not
needed.

> +
> +/**
>   * Decrease reference counter and unlink a mbuf segment
>   *
>   * This function does the same than a free, except that it does not
> @@ -1198,7 +1277,8 @@ static inline void rte_pktmbuf_detach(struct rte_mbuf *m)
>  	if (likely(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m) == 1)) {
>  
>  		if (!RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(m))
> -			rte_pktmbuf_detach(m);
> +			if (__rte_pktmbuf_detach_on_free(m))
> +				return NULL;
>  
>  		if (m->next != NULL) {
>  			m->next = NULL;
> @@ -1210,7 +1290,8 @@ static inline void rte_pktmbuf_detach(struct rte_mbuf *m)
>  	} else if (__rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(m, -1) == 0) {
>  
>  		if (!RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(m))
> -			rte_pktmbuf_detach(m);
> +			if (__rte_pktmbuf_detach_on_free(m))
> +				return NULL;
>  
>  		if (m->next != NULL) {
>  			m->next = NULL;
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-20 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-18  9:50 [dpdk-dev] [RFC v20.20] mbuf: introduce pktmbuf pool with pinned external buffers Shahaf Shuler
2019-11-18 16:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-01-10 17:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-10 17:56   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] mbuf: detach mbuf with pinned external buffer Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-10 18:23     ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-01-13 17:07       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-14  7:19       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-10 17:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] mbuf: create packet pool with external memory buffers Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-10 17:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] app/testpmd: add mempool with external data buffers Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-10 17:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net/mlx5: allow use allocated mbuf with external buffer Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-14  7:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] mbuf: introduce pktmbuf pool with pinned external buffers Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-14  7:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] mbuf: detach mbuf with pinned external buffer Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-14  7:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] mbuf: create packet pool with external memory buffers Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-14  7:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] app/testpmd: add mempool with external data buffers Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-14  7:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] net/mlx5: allow use allocated mbuf with external buffer Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-14  9:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] mbuf: detach mbuf with pinned " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-14  9:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-14 15:27     ` Olivier Matz
2020-01-15 12:52       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-14 15:50     ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-01-14  9:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] mbuf: create packet pool with external memory buffers Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-14 16:04     ` Olivier Matz
2020-01-15 18:13       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-14  9:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] app/testpmd: add mempool with external data buffers Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-14  9:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] net/mlx5: allow use allocated mbuf with external buffer Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-16 13:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/5] mbuf: detach mbuf with pinned " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-16 13:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/5] mbuf: introduce routine to get private mbuf pool flags Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-20 12:16     ` Olivier Matz
2020-01-16 13:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/5] mbuf: detach mbuf with pinned external buffer Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-20 13:56     ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2020-01-20 15:41       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-20 16:17         ` Olivier Matz
2020-01-16 13:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/5] mbuf: create packet pool with external memory buffers Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-20 13:59     ` Olivier Matz
2020-01-20 17:33       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-16 13:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/5] app/testpmd: add mempool with external data buffers Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-20 14:11     ` Olivier Matz
2020-01-16 13:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/5] net/mlx5: allow use allocated mbuf with external buffer Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-20 17:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/5] mbuf: detach mbuf with pinned " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-20 17:23   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/5] mbuf: introduce routine to get private mbuf pool flags Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-20 20:43     ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-01-20 22:52       ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-21  6:48       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-21  8:00       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-21  8:14         ` Olivier Matz
2020-01-21  8:23           ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-21  9:13             ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-21 14:01               ` Olivier Matz
2020-01-21 16:21                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-01-20 17:23   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/5] mbuf: detach mbuf with pinned external buffer Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-20 17:40     ` Olivier Matz
2020-01-20 17:23   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/5] mbuf: create packet pool with external memory buffers Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-20 17:46     ` Olivier Matz
2020-01-20 17:23   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/5] app/testpmd: add mempool with external data buffers Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-20 17:23   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/5] net/mlx5: allow use allocated mbuf with external buffer Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-20 17:30   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/5] mbuf: detach mbuf with pinned " Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-20 17:41     ` Olivier Matz
2020-01-20 19:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-20 19:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/5] mbuf: introduce routine to get private mbuf pool flags Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-20 19:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/5] mbuf: detach mbuf with pinned external buffer Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-12-06 10:55     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/5] mbuf: detach mbuf with pinned externalbuffer Morten Brørup
2020-01-20 19:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/5] mbuf: create packet pool with external memory buffers Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-20 20:48     ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-01-21  7:04       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-20 19:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/5] app/testpmd: add mempool with external data buffers Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-20 19:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/5] net/mlx5: allow use allocated mbuf with external buffer Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-20 22:55   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/5] mbuf: detach mbuf with pinned " Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-22  8:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: fix pinned memory free routine style issue Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-02-06  9:46   ` Olivier Matz
2020-02-06 14:26     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-24 20:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test: add test for mbuf with pinned external buffer Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-26 10:53   ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-02-06  8:17   ` Olivier Matz
2020-02-06  8:24     ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-02-06  9:51       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-02-06  9:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-02-06 14:43     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200120135607.GI14387@glumotte.dev.6wind.com \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=matan@mellanox.com \
    --cc=orika@mellanox.com \
    --cc=rasland@mellanox.com \
    --cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@mellanox.net \
    --cc=viacheslavo@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).