From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A4CA053A; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 17:15:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041C12956; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 17:15:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pl1-f173.google.com (mail-pl1-f173.google.com [209.85.214.173]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A907E07 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 17:15:30 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pl1-f173.google.com with SMTP id t6so1545628plj.5 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 08:15:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xmjuhzykMhKIO2nCGBrAPGe9bgVwwOiU422nW30NCtM=; b=yqFI024MLE9Y0BQ8kEJ9X7TPlvSpWJe9IEIBvHCwaL1tJC1pQWQxBaYlOurp8TWwwf F8JqBbpa4J5adlm5hXBFoYDGIylTGxtwXaJTqqyhBlhTZezTthacrSysNimpK2fdlfAV QVL7ZpyLMm3MF+0u/gHMIdFUQ5Xf3jY6p7MnLi9D1/9fKvUuoW9pKh1WDjBVG7X/o0Ei VB+PKFP8zeSLVauke3SdmiJfztlR0Uo6FBFt7G35dwvq2yrvUnbyH300z9FKlW+SnegI 2WRB8Zloe2N+nkdnAemVNxSwWUOVn2HEgpWKljMwBvQrwMqi35QzgysRB6deHbgS8oBw jrug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xmjuhzykMhKIO2nCGBrAPGe9bgVwwOiU422nW30NCtM=; b=KLOZk0yYXLJRiwFElyNsWNJLKnfKCG0eA6vv4Y77GTlzQj/OxvbSgQRlLJXo3XDiQK HrsEAtpSUafCsTs5ssmQTRcMyv/6aIZ534bfv5Ds8xPgGKc22fj/s8OiQXumiPuFfTEs eEocvN77NUnPlJIZQGfuQC2mXobkled431DPoXIZMMZ45BQe2IQKbCy1kNJDFQ/jlkWC JlRjBOjSh11kkjkGZZ8mJ5rvTa8JX1ZPTF8bvT2VaNQA1IjdttkuBFcwijPgA7KP1Bk0 +hyAV6VUUnjSlY5Mq1z9qVH7ykafq4FuMHp1bfbUK2BddWudKy0iDah8UTtmS1t+gY6g rxVA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV/PYu7G14AYf9Eq1QjECe9DZjP/e0i4JFQxqIvIHvKABGKkEuV xz7qPoO7s1RtyrrSMrlN/D3BPGqaOyc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxDB/qDcI0bkx2uWlWHk0re3M6DSThTUgQ4fNsT9P7CtL0gm5aV6i3GlSHHpja38niquFfi3Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:31cc:: with SMTP id j12mr5144653pjf.103.1579796129537; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 08:15:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k5sm3325738pju.29.2020.01.23.08.15.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 23 Jan 2020 08:15:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 08:15:18 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Lance Richardson Cc: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20200123081518.4c836e60@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] coding style question - c99 comments X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 11:05:58 -0500 Lance Richardson wrote: > The DPDK Coding Style document doesn't mention the use of c99 comments > using '//' as a comment delimiter, but it does say that traditional > '/* */' comment > delimiters should be used and therefore seems to imply that c99-style comments > are not allowed. > > Is this correct? > > Lance Don't use c99 comments. These will get flagged by checkpatch