From: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: xiaolong.ye@intel.com, Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>,
stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] net/af_xdp: use correct fill queue addresses
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 08:49:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200213084914.54755-3-ciara.loftus@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200213084914.54755-1-ciara.loftus@intel.com>
The fill queue addresses should start at the beginning of the mempool
object instead of the beginning of the mbuf. This is because the umem
frame headroom includes the mp hdrobj size. Starting at this point
ensures AF_XDP doesn't write past the available room in the frame, in
the case of larger packets which are close to the size of the mbuf.
Fixes: d8a210774e1d ("net/af_xdp: support unaligned umem chunks")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
index 111ab000cc..a0edfc3cd3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
@@ -171,7 +171,8 @@ reserve_fill_queue_zc(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, uint16_t reserve_size,
uint64_t addr;
fq_addr = xsk_ring_prod__fill_addr(fq, idx++);
- addr = (uint64_t)bufs[i] - (uint64_t)umem->buffer;
+ addr = (uint64_t)bufs[i] - (uint64_t)umem->buffer -
+ umem->mb_pool->header_size;
*fq_addr = addr;
}
@@ -270,8 +271,11 @@ af_xdp_rx_zc(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
addr = xsk_umem__extract_addr(addr);
bufs[i] = (struct rte_mbuf *)
- xsk_umem__get_data(umem->buffer, addr);
- bufs[i]->data_off = offset - sizeof(struct rte_mbuf);
+ xsk_umem__get_data(umem->buffer, addr +
+ umem->mb_pool->header_size);
+ bufs[i]->data_off = offset - sizeof(struct rte_mbuf) -
+ rte_pktmbuf_priv_size(umem->mb_pool) -
+ umem->mb_pool->header_size;
rte_pktmbuf_pkt_len(bufs[i]) = len;
rte_pktmbuf_data_len(bufs[i]) = len;
@@ -384,7 +388,8 @@ pull_umem_cq(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, int size)
#if defined(XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNK_FLAG)
addr = xsk_umem__extract_addr(addr);
rte_pktmbuf_free((struct rte_mbuf *)
- xsk_umem__get_data(umem->buffer, addr));
+ xsk_umem__get_data(umem->buffer,
+ addr + umem->mb_pool->header_size));
#else
rte_ring_enqueue(umem->buf_ring, (void *)addr);
#endif
@@ -442,9 +447,11 @@ af_xdp_tx_zc(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
}
desc = xsk_ring_prod__tx_desc(&txq->tx, idx_tx);
desc->len = mbuf->pkt_len;
- addr = (uint64_t)mbuf - (uint64_t)umem->buffer;
+ addr = (uint64_t)mbuf - (uint64_t)umem->buffer -
+ umem->mb_pool->header_size;
offset = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mbuf, uint64_t) -
- (uint64_t)mbuf;
+ (uint64_t)mbuf +
+ umem->mb_pool->header_size;
offset = offset << XSK_UNALIGNED_BUF_OFFSET_SHIFT;
desc->addr = addr | offset;
count++;
@@ -465,9 +472,11 @@ af_xdp_tx_zc(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
desc = xsk_ring_prod__tx_desc(&txq->tx, idx_tx);
desc->len = mbuf->pkt_len;
- addr = (uint64_t)local_mbuf - (uint64_t)umem->buffer;
+ addr = (uint64_t)local_mbuf - (uint64_t)umem->buffer -
+ umem->mb_pool->header_size;
offset = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(local_mbuf, uint64_t) -
- (uint64_t)local_mbuf;
+ (uint64_t)local_mbuf +
+ umem->mb_pool->header_size;
pkt = xsk_umem__get_data(umem->buffer, addr + offset);
offset = offset << XSK_UNALIGNED_BUF_OFFSET_SHIFT;
desc->addr = addr | offset;
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-13 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-13 8:49 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] AF_XDP PMD Fixes Ciara Loftus
2020-02-13 8:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] net/af_xdp: fix umem frame size & headroom calculations Ciara Loftus
2020-02-13 8:49 ` Ciara Loftus [this message]
2020-02-13 8:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] net/af_xdp: fix maximum MTU value Ciara Loftus
2020-02-13 9:26 ` Ye Xiaolong
2020-02-13 12:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] AF_XDP PMD Fixes Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200213084914.54755-3-ciara.loftus@intel.com \
--to=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).