DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dev@dpdk.org, mtosatti@redhat.com,
	thomas@monjalon.net, bluca@debian.org, jerinjacobk@gmail.com,
	bruce.richardson@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/7] vfio: Introduce VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE ioctl and first user
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:41:21 +0100
Message-ID: <20200213134121.54b8debb.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <158146235133.16827.7215789038918853214.stgit@gimli.home>

On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 16:05:51 -0700
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:

> The VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE ioctl is meant to be a general purpose, device
> agnostic ioctl for setting, retrieving, and probing device features.
> This implementation provides a 16-bit field for specifying a feature
> index, where the data porition of the ioctl is determined by the
> semantics for the given feature.  Additional flag bits indicate the
> direction and nature of the operation; SET indicates user data is
> provided into the device feature, GET indicates the device feature is
> written out into user data.  The PROBE flag augments determining
> whether the given feature is supported, and if provided, whether the
> given operation on the feature is supported.
> 
> The first user of this ioctl is for setting the vfio-pci VF token,
> where the user provides a shared secret key (UUID) on a SR-IOV PF
> device, which users must provide when opening associated VF devices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c |   52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h   |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 89 insertions(+)

(...)

> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index 9e843a147ead..c5cbf04ce5a7 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -707,6 +707,43 @@ struct vfio_device_ioeventfd {
>  
>  #define VFIO_DEVICE_IOEVENTFD		_IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 16)
>  
> +/**
> + * VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE - _IORW(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 17,
> + *			       struct vfio_device_feature

Missing ')'

> + *
> + * Get, set, or probe feature data of the device.  The feature is selected
> + * using the FEATURE_MASK portion of the flags field.  Support for a feature
> + * can be probed by setting both the FEATURE_MASK and PROBE bits.  A probe
> + * may optionally include the GET and/or SET bits to determine read vs write
> + * access of the feature respectively.  Probing a feature will return success
> + * if the feature is supported and all of the optionally indicated GET/SET
> + * methods are supported.  The format of the data portion of the structure is

If neither GET nor SET are specified, will it return success if any of
the two are supported?

> + * specific to the given feature.  The data portion is not required for
> + * probing.
> + *
> + * Return 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> + */
> +struct vfio_device_feature {
> +	__u32	argsz;
> +	__u32	flags;
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_MASK	(0xffff) /* 16-bit feature index */
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_GET		(1 << 16) /* Get feature into data[] */
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_SET		(1 << 17) /* Set feature from data[] */
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_PROBE	(1 << 18) /* Probe feature support */
> +	__u8	data[];
> +};

I'm not sure I'm a fan of cramming both feature selection and operation
selection into flags. What about:

struct vfio_device_feature {
	__u32 argsz;
	__u32 flags;
/* GET/SET/PROBE #defines */
	__u32 feature;
	__u8  data[];
};

Getting/setting more than one feature at the same time does not sound
like a common use case; you would need to specify some kind of
algorithm for that anyway, and just doing it individually seems much
easier than that.

> +
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE		_IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 17)
> +
> +/*
> + * Provide support for setting a PCI VF Token, which is used as a shared
> + * secret between PF and VF drivers.  This feature may only be set on a
> + * PCI SR-IOV PF when SR-IOV is enabled on the PF and there are no existing
> + * open VFs.  Data provided when setting this feature is a 16-byte array
> + * (__u8 b[16]), representing a UUID.

No objection to that.

> + */
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_PCI_VF_TOKEN	(0)
> +
>  /* -------- API for Type1 VFIO IOMMU -------- */
>  
>  /**
> 


  reply index

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-11 23:05 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] vfio/pci: SR-IOV support Alex Williamson
2020-02-11 23:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] vfio: Include optional device match in vfio_device_ops callbacks Alex Williamson
2020-02-13 10:31   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-11 23:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/7] vfio/pci: Implement match ops Alex Williamson
2020-02-13 11:04   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-11 23:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] vfio/pci: Introduce VF token Alex Williamson
2020-02-13 11:46   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-13 17:23     ` Alex Williamson
2020-02-13 18:35       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-14 23:40         ` Alex Williamson
2020-02-11 23:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/7] vfio: Introduce VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE ioctl and first user Alex Williamson
2020-02-13 12:41   ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2020-02-13 17:39     ` Alex Williamson
2020-02-13 18:08       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-11 23:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/7] vfio/pci: Add sriov_configure support Alex Williamson
2020-02-11 23:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/7] vfio/pci: Remove dev_fmt definition Alex Williamson
2020-02-11 23:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] vfio/pci: Cleanup .probe() exit paths Alex Williamson
2020-02-14  4:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] vfio/pci: SR-IOV support Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-02-14 15:27   ` Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200213134121.54b8debb.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox