From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: matan@mellanox.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, stable@dpdk.org,
Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] app/testpmd: fix hot-unplug detaching
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 16:52:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200213155226.1024939-3-thomas@monjalon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200213155226.1024939-1-thomas@monjalon.net>
There is a possible race condition in the hotplug path
in rmv_port_callback(). If a port is created between
close_port(port_id) and detach_port_device(port_id),
then the port_id will have been reallocated to a different
device which will be wrongly detached.
Since a check was added in detach_port_device() for
manual detach case, the hotplug path was even more broken.
It became impossible to run because the new check prevented
to run detach_port_device() after the port is closed.
The solution for both issues is to not rely on the port_id
for detaching the rte_device.
The function detach_port_device() is split to allow calling
detach_device() directly with the rte_device pointer, saved
before closing the port.
Fixes: 43d0e304980a ("app/testpmd: fix invalid port detaching")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
---
app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
index 11203cb03d..035836adfb 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
@@ -2633,32 +2633,17 @@ setup_attached_port(portid_t pi)
printf("Done\n");
}
-void
-detach_port_device(portid_t port_id)
+static void
+detach_device(struct rte_device *dev)
{
- struct rte_device *dev;
portid_t sibling;
- printf("Removing a device...\n");
-
- if (port_id_is_invalid(port_id, ENABLED_WARN))
- return;
-
- dev = rte_eth_devices[port_id].device;
if (dev == NULL) {
printf("Device already removed\n");
return;
}
- if (ports[port_id].port_status != RTE_PORT_CLOSED) {
- if (ports[port_id].port_status != RTE_PORT_STOPPED) {
- printf("Port not stopped\n");
- return;
- }
- printf("Port was not closed\n");
- if (ports[port_id].flow_list)
- port_flow_flush(port_id);
- }
+ printf("Removing a device...\n");
if (rte_dev_remove(dev) < 0) {
TESTPMD_LOG(ERR, "Failed to detach device %s\n", dev->name);
@@ -2676,13 +2661,31 @@ detach_port_device(portid_t port_id)
remove_invalid_ports();
- printf("Device of port %u is detached\n", port_id);
+ printf("Device is detached\n");
printf("Now total ports is %d\n", nb_ports);
printf("Done\n");
return;
}
void
+detach_port_device(portid_t port_id)
+{
+ if (port_id_is_invalid(port_id, ENABLED_WARN))
+ return;
+
+ if (ports[port_id].port_status != RTE_PORT_CLOSED) {
+ if (ports[port_id].port_status != RTE_PORT_STOPPED) {
+ printf("Port not stopped\n");
+ return;
+ }
+ printf("Port was not closed\n");
+ if (ports[port_id].flow_list)
+ port_flow_flush(port_id);
+ }
+
+ detach_device(rte_eth_devices[port_id].device);
+}
+
void
detach_devargs(char *identifier)
{
@@ -2873,6 +2876,7 @@ rmv_port_callback(void *arg)
int need_to_start = 0;
int org_no_link_check = no_link_check;
portid_t port_id = (intptr_t)arg;
+ struct rte_device *dev;
RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_RET(port_id);
@@ -2883,8 +2887,12 @@ rmv_port_callback(void *arg)
no_link_check = 1;
stop_port(port_id);
no_link_check = org_no_link_check;
+
+ /* Save rte_device pointer before closing ethdev port */
+ dev = rte_eth_devices[port_id].device;
close_port(port_id);
- detach_port_device(port_id);
+ detach_device(dev); /* might be already removed or have more ports */
+
if (need_to_start)
start_packet_forwarding(0);
}
--
2.25.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-13 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-13 15:52 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] app/testpmd: fix detach Thomas Monjalon
2020-02-13 15:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] app/testpmd: rename function for detaching by devargs Thomas Monjalon
2020-02-13 15:52 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-02-16 8:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] app/testpmd: fix hot-unplug detaching Matan Azrad
2020-02-16 9:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-02-17 9:50 ` Kevin Traynor
2020-02-13 18:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] app/testpmd: fix detach Ferruh Yigit
2020-02-13 20:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200213155226.1024939-3-thomas@monjalon.net \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=matan@mellanox.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).