From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC229A0550; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 17:40:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0FA1BF75; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 17:40:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1AD43B5; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 17:40:23 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Feb 2020 08:40:22 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,449,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="282316902" Received: from yexl-server.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.67.117.17]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2020 08:40:19 -0800 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:38:49 +0800 From: Ye Xiaolong To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, Gavin Hu , dev@dpdk.org, nd@arm.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, jerinj@marvell.com, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, ruifeng.wang@arm.com, phil.yang@arm.com, joyce.kong@arm.com, steve.capper@arm.com, stable@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20200216163849.GA60672@intel.com> References: <1571758074-16445-1-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com> <20200212055621.118363-1-gavin.hu@arm.com> <20200215151635.GH16933@intel.com> <1739253.u6TykanW85@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1739253.u6TykanW85@xps> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] net/i40e: relaxed barrier in the tx fastpath X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi, Thomas On 02/16, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >15/02/2020 16:16, Ye Xiaolong: >> s/relaxed/relax >> >> On 02/12, Gavin Hu wrote: >> >To keep ordering of mixed accesses, rte_cio is sufficient. >> >The rte_io barrier inside the I40E_PCI_REG_WRITE is overkill.[1] >[...] >> >> Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel with Jerin's Reviewed-by tag, Thanks. > >I assume it is too much risky doing such optimization post-rc3. Yes, this iss a valid concern, I agree to postpone it to next release. > >Ferruh, Xiaolong, you don't plan anymore pull from dpdk-next-net-intel >in 20.02? There are still some bug fixing work going on in PRC, so I assume there should be some fix patches after RC3, they are still allowed to be merged to 20.02, if the fix is relatively small in terms of lines of code and scope, right? Thanks, Xiaolong > >