From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC5AA0551; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 02:19:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8924C2C4F; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 02:19:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BC92B93 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 02:19:55 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Feb 2020 17:19:54 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,450,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="223662824" Received: from yexl-server.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.67.117.17]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2020 17:19:52 -0800 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 09:18:21 +0800 From: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com> To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> Cc: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>, Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> Message-ID: <20200217011821.GB61057@intel.com> References: <20191129081911.92988-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com> <2438326.H8VbNj7W2P@xps> <20200216172938.GA61057@intel.com> <10012834.3WhfQktd6Z@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <10012834.3WhfQktd6Z@xps> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] doc: introduce openwrt how-to guide X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On 02/16, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >16/02/2020 18:29, Ye Xiaolong: >> On 02/16, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> >18/01/2020 06:48, Xiaolong Ye: >> >[...] >> >> + [binaries] >> >> + c = 'x86_64-openwrt-linux-gcc' >> >> + cpp = 'x86_64-openwrt-linux-cpp' >> >> + ar = 'x86_64-openwrt-linux-ar' >> >> + strip = 'x86_64-openwrt-linux-strip' >> >> + >> >> + meson builddir --cross-file openwrt-cross >> > >> >This is really a good example why meson should allow to override the toolchain prefix. >> >> Not sure whether I get your point or not, do you mean meson should support >> something like "cross = 'x86_64-openwrt-linux-'" in config file (just like the >> CROSS_COMPILE for make build system), so we don't need to override the build >> tools one by one? > >Yes, I think meson should support CROSS_COMPILE environment variable >or a similar config option. I don't see the point of creating a new >config file for each toolchain prefix. Totally agree, I would try to work on this to make it happen. > > >> >> + to /usr/lib64 in OpenWrt. >> > >> >libnuma is not packaged in OpenWrt? >> >> Unfortunately not, I guess the reason maybe OpenWrt is mainly focused on low-end >> embedded systems which don't have numa support. > >I would be nice to work on it in OpenWrt project then. Make sense, I would submit a request to OpenWrt project. Thanks, Xiaolong > > >