From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8297EA054F; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:51:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6B11D8CC; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:51:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4021BF91 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:51:15 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Feb 2020 01:51:14 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,456,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="235486264" Received: from yexl-server.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.67.117.17]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2020 01:51:12 -0800 Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:49:37 +0800 From: Ye Xiaolong To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: "Mcnamara, John" , Ray Kinsella , "Kovacevic, Marko" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Richardson, Bruce" , Stephen Hemminger Message-ID: <20200218094937.GC104429@intel.com> References: <20191129081911.92988-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com> <792912224.0ifERbkFSE@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <792912224.0ifERbkFSE@xps> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] doc: introduce openwrt how-to guide X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 02/18, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >18/02/2020 10:12, Ray Kinsella: >> On 18/02/2020 08:26, Mcnamara, John wrote: >> > From: Ray Kinsella >> >> So to be clear. >> >> I see that documentation like this is brittle and has a limited lifespan. >> >> I can almost guarantee the next version of DPDK or OpenWRT will break it. >> >> (and how would we know?) >> >> >> >> Much better to do this in the right place - OpenWRT. >> > >> > Hi Ray, >> > >> > These comments are a little late, we have been through 6 revisions. >> >> Understood. >> >> > I suggest putting the doc in as it is, since it useful, and revise it to make it more update proof in the next release. >> >> Agreed - feedback was late. >> I am registering my protest, that this cannot be called 'done' - further work is required to make this sustainable. > >I agree the most important is to work on DPDK integration. >Would be nice to have DPDK integrated as a package in OpenWrt >and in Buildroot as well. Yes, agree this would be a better and clean solution. >And please make sure meson allows to choose any toolchain easily. It's in my todo list now. :) Thanks, Xiaolong > >Thanks > >