From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Min Tang <tommytang@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] net/netvsc: subchannel configuration failed due to unexpected NVS response
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2020 09:54:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200301095402.6d570e83@hermes.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEHUbGT6exgRiV4_5kjOZgfSwuyP53Lci6qAzvQowM8K=vn3_A@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:16:01 -0500
Min Tang <tommytang@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Stephen:
>
> I saw the following error messages when using DPDK 18.11.2 in Azure:
>
> hn_nvs_execute(): unexpected NVS resp 0x6b, expect 0x85
> hn_dev_configure(): subchannel configuration failed
>
> It was not easy to reproduce it and it only occurred with multiple queues
> enabled. In hn_nvs_execute it expects the response to match the request. In
> the failed case, it was expecting NVS_TYPE_SUBCH_REQ (133 or 0x85) but
> got NVS_TYPE_RNDIS(107 or 0x6b). Obviously somewhere the NVS_TYPE_RNDIS
> message had been sent before the NVS_TYPE_SUBCH_REQ message was sent. I
> looked at the code and found that the NVS_TYPE_RNDIS message needs
> completion response but it does not receive the response message anywhere.
> The fix would be receiving and discarding the wrong response message(s).
>
> I put the following patches and it has fixed the problem.
>
> --- a/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_nvs.c 2020-02-27 11:08:29.755530969 -0500
> +++ b/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_nvs.c 2020-02-27 11:07:21.567371798 -0500
> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@
> if (hdr->type != type) {
> PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "unexpected NVS resp %#x, expect %#x",
> hdr->type, type);
> - goto retry;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> if (len < resplen) {
The situation is that NVS_TYPE_RNDIS is a receive packet that is
arriving while subchannel is being setup. For first channel this
doesn't happen because control operations at that level happen
before packets arrive.
Needs some more research before coming up with a good fix.
Either the processing of responses in nvs_execute needs to use
the same receive processing function as normal data. Which
means adding logic to wait for condition; or the incoming
packets there could be dropped; or the device needs to be
stopped before configuring sub channels.
Dropping is probably the easiest to implement.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-01 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-27 16:16 Min Tang
2020-02-27 17:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-02-27 18:24 ` Min Tang
2020-03-01 17:54 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2020-03-02 15:40 ` Min Tang
2020-03-02 16:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200301095402.6d570e83@hermes.lan \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=tommytang@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).