From: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/7] eal: introduce portable format attribute
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 02:38:26 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200314023826.699ab6c0@Sovereign> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3094952.KgjxqYA5nG@xps>
> I suggest this change (I can send a patch fixing the issue in other .h files):
>
> +/*
> + * RTE_TOOLCHAIN_GCC is true if the target is built with GCC,
> + * while a host application (like pmdinfogen) may have another compiler.
> + * RTE_CC_IS_GNU is true if the file is compiled with GCC,
> + * no matter it is a target or host application.
> + */
> +#if defined __GNUC__ && !defined __clang__ && !defined __INTEL_COMPILER
> +#define RTE_CC_IS_GNU
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef RTE_CC_IS_GNU
> -/** Define GCC_VERSION **/
> -#ifdef RTE_TOOLCHAIN_GCC
> #define GCC_VERSION (__GNUC__ * 10000 + __GNUC_MINOR__ * 100 + \
> __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__)
> #endif
> @@ -96,7 +105,7 @@ typedef uint16_t unaligned_uint16_t;
> * even if the underlying stdio implementation is ANSI-compliant,
> * so this must be overridden.
> */
> -#if defined(RTE_TOOLCHAIN_GCC)
> +#ifdef RTE_CC_IS_GNU
> #define __rte_format_printf(format_index, first_arg) \
> __attribute__((format(gnu_printf, format_index, first_arg)))
> #else
The code you propose LGTM itself. If you think it's a better solution than
the one proposed below, I see no problem going with it.
What I wonder is whether pmdinfogen should include the problematic code in the
first place. The errors come from declarations in rte_debug.h, but pmdinfogen
really can't use them, because definitions are compiled for different
machine. Pmdinfogen pulls rte_debug.h via rte_pci.h, which is only needed for
struct rte_pci_id. Shouldn't we instead break this bogus dependency chain by
moving struct rte_pci_id to a separate header?
EAL defines are tied to the target toolchain and are consistent with each
other, from this point of view RTE_CC_IS_GNU looks like a workaround. Another
reason why pmdinfogen should not depend on EAL is that its code will differ
considerably for POSIX and Windows (ELF vs COFF, mmap vs Win32 API).
--
Dmitry Kozlyuk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-13 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-18 0:02 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/7] MinGW-w64 support Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-02-18 0:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/7] eal: introduce portable format attribute Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-02-18 0:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/7] eal/windows: use lowercase filenames for system headers Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-02-18 0:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/7] eal/windows: support builing with MinGW-w64 Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-02-18 0:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/7] build: MinGW-w64 support for Meson Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-02-18 14:26 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-02-18 14:54 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-02-18 0:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/7] build: add cross-file for MinGW-w64 Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-02-18 0:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/7] doc: guide for Windows build using MinGW-w64 Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-02-18 21:27 ` William Tu
2020-02-18 0:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 7/7] build: fix linker warnings with Clang on Windows Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-02-18 21:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/7] MinGW-w64 support William Tu
2020-02-27 4:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-02-27 4:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/7] eal: introduce portable format attribute Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-03-12 22:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-13 23:38 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk [this message]
2020-03-15 8:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-16 10:54 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-03-16 11:02 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-03-16 11:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-16 11:18 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-03-16 11:35 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-03-16 14:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-02-27 4:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/7] eal/windows: use lowercase filenames for system headers Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-02-27 4:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/7] eal/windows: support builing with MinGW-w64 Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-02-27 4:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/7] build: MinGW-w64 support for Meson Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-02-27 4:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/7] build: add cross-file for MinGW-w64 Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-02-27 4:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/7] doc: guide for Windows build using MinGW-w64 Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-02-27 4:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 7/7] build: fix linker warnings with Clang on Windows Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-03-11 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/7] MinGW-w64 support William Tu
2020-03-18 0:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-11 22:36 ` Kadam, Pallavi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200314023826.699ab6c0@Sovereign \
--to=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).