From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A55A0562; Sat, 4 Apr 2020 18:54:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3D45F13; Sat, 4 Apr 2020 18:54:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pf1-f178.google.com (mail-pf1-f178.google.com [209.85.210.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D551A4C8A for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2020 18:54:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-f178.google.com with SMTP id a13so5296739pfa.2 for ; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 09:54:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bOoBJ3a3QpUivubKSylJSY8AEQF0gria1lNeOC1yP00=; b=M0Jj6dEy87IHI9rNv0mMMpzy48jojcFOF0VB4RG73YlVft7wrIGiVlGF1JE50Iqfb+ pbC5uPgJWUcAypogG6+AfjQ+ZwdlP9ISllCank9ckxYzsQXmwLGEcWBQsZLD+YI8vwJS jRc0C7b8QBUPUXK4XCddoONjoHOe76D6o9sQqx5P8KoyEtRDttBkla8DYuXYHuvfXEaq Rz53p/xMYf2IYxH6lniBJ3TQsBqrweAdljldz8bXx+ffp72BMpZLOZdSUWFIzeSFrPQW gEOIafn+GjLLfL7017P/fdyGJyVidUBQDGZYIXH0YfMBJr74sdQDhK6JnPDx/uI0qa9Q uLJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bOoBJ3a3QpUivubKSylJSY8AEQF0gria1lNeOC1yP00=; b=Wd124jgua1ky0t13gqIdHwrQ2ux5nXcdStPrrdHoXp5ZfETxEhELT0u3bGBTgAR/Jg itLAj4dED/2c5g3b8QpIA9BMUeHjldT++dOYv2JnuZdIaDsaM4adZ3TuDfoa3uT03B7E G7KjwpeyNZ7Enlvllik3xnpfrI97k6QScHIO+vTX2+Eoh43ZR37kvt5XjM4/XLWIF48Q VHJitMyy2mvaTC7tMlbA6Eoa70AxSJzRmz2tOUFq+VM851q+dL4Rm4ky7NxQOIyfvNtl Cpa2B6WQ80zYCSR+8zPl01cWKKQeRBVWAATOp70vXFRqyW5YJrhUQt5CDaVgKVBYWEka ov8g== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuacOmghAZuKhJgq/1hq/DppYXQuBNFhK6di/s1rbxTCO9Wj6s4z RRFbhYFUicV1NeKPRwQnZ4BRTg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI3O+pRw9qrBmG2lbJBTeYscZQP5x9z63L/rp8Leqc5y0L56AW3ygaKkaVTdO4UIpge/Su1Kw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:c007:: with SMTP id h7mr13301962pgg.428.1586019264984; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 09:54:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h198sm7989532pfe.76.2020.04.04.09.54.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 04 Apr 2020 09:54:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2020 09:54:16 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: bugzilla@dpdk.org Cc: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20200404095416.4d44bcfb@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [Bug 438] memif sock does not honor file-prefix X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Sat, 04 Apr 2020 02:42:15 +0000 bugzilla@dpdk.org wrote: > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438 > > Bug ID: 438 > Summary: memif sock does not honor file-prefix > Product: DPDK > Version: 20.02 > Hardware: x86 > OS: Linux > Status: UNCONFIRMED > Severity: normal > Priority: Normal > Component: ethdev > Assignee: dev@dpdk.org > Reporter: vipin.varghese@intel.com > Target Milestone: --- > > CMD: ./build/l2fwd --vdev=net_tap0 --vdev=net_memif,role=master -l 8,51 > --socket-mem=104,0 --socket-limit=1024,0 --file-prefix=custom > --proc-type=primary --no-pci -- -p 0x3 -T 1 > > Issue: start DPDK application with memif. > > > observation: > ` > EAL: Multi-process socket /var/run/dpdk/custom/mp_socket > EAL: Selected IOVA mode 'VA' > EAL: Probing VFIO support... > memif_socket_create(): Failed to setup socket /run/memif.sock: Address already > in use > ` > > expectation: memif sock interface is to be in `/run/dpdk/custom/memif.sock` and > not `/run/memif.sock` If it just used abstract socket type it would not have this problem.