From: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: qiming.yang@intel.com
Cc: xiaolong.ye@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org,
Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice/base: remove unnecessary code
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 08:25:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200407002523.37881-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com> (raw)
Update a switch rule' action from "to VSI" to "to VSI List"
should only happen when the same rule has been programmed with
a different fwd destination. This is already handled by below
code block:
m_entry = ice_find_adv_rule_entry(...)
if (m_entry) {
...
ice_adv_add_update_vsi_list(...)
}
The following ice_update_pkt_fwd_rule is unnecessary and should be
removed due to:
1) If a switch rule's action is still to VSI, which means, it is
the first time be issued, we don't need to update it "to VSI
List."
2) Actually the implementation does not match the comment, it still
update the rule with "to VSI" action.
Fixes: fed0c5ca5f19 ("net/ice/base: support programming a new switch recipe")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c | 18 +-----------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c b/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c
index b5aa5abd9..07f8efd65 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c
@@ -6695,24 +6695,8 @@ ice_add_adv_rule(struct ice_hw *hw, struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *lkups,
sw->recp_list[rid].adv_rule = true;
rule_head = &sw->recp_list[rid].filt_rules;
- if (rinfo->sw_act.fltr_act == ICE_FWD_TO_VSI) {
- struct ice_fltr_info tmp_fltr;
-
- ice_memset(&tmp_fltr, 0, sizeof(tmp_fltr), ICE_NONDMA_MEM);
- tmp_fltr.fltr_rule_id =
- LE16_TO_CPU(s_rule->pdata.lkup_tx_rx.index);
- tmp_fltr.fltr_act = ICE_FWD_TO_VSI;
- tmp_fltr.fwd_id.hw_vsi_id =
- ice_get_hw_vsi_num(hw, vsi_handle);
- tmp_fltr.vsi_handle = vsi_handle;
- /* Update the previous switch rule of "forward to VSI" to
- * "fwd to VSI list"
- */
- status = ice_update_pkt_fwd_rule(hw, &tmp_fltr);
- if (status)
- goto err_ice_add_adv_rule;
+ if (rinfo->sw_act.fltr_act == ICE_FWD_TO_VSI)
adv_fltr->vsi_count = 1;
- }
/* Add rule entry to book keeping list */
LIST_ADD(&adv_fltr->list_entry, rule_head);
--
2.13.6
next reply other threads:[~2020-04-07 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-07 0:25 Qi Zhang [this message]
2020-04-08 7:02 ` Ye Xiaolong
2021-05-10 3:21 Qi Zhang
2021-05-10 3:23 Qi Zhang
2021-05-10 5:02 ` Yang, Qiming
2021-05-10 5:44 ` Zhang, Qi Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200407002523.37881-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--to=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).