From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E26A0597; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 15:03:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B221C219; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 15:03:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36741C204 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 15:03:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 2606-a000-111b-43ee-0000-0000-0000-1bf2.inf6.spectrum.com ([2606:a000:111b:43ee::1bf2] helo=localhost) by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1jMWpc-0004fW-VO; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 09:03:01 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:02:56 -0400 From: Neil Horman To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Bruce Richardson , Ray Kinsella , dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com Message-ID: <20200409130256.GA393692@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> References: <20200408195616.335004-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> <20200409104317.GB613@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> <926b5dce-1904-5fbf-39ce-8c08661b83d1@ashroe.eu> <1737651.3VsfAaAtOV@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1737651.3VsfAaAtOV@thomas> X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv2] Remove validate-abi.sh from tree X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 12:59:50PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 09/04/2020 12:45, Ray Kinsella: > > On 09/04/2020 11:43, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 06:39:54AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > > >> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 08:57:34AM +0100, Ray Kinsella wrote: > > >>> On 08/04/2020 20:56, Neil Horman wrote: > > >>>> +The syntax of the ``check-abi.sh`` utility is:: > > >>>> + > > >>>> + ./devtools/check-abi.sh > > >>> > > >>> (from v1 feedback) > > >>> Could we simplify this all greatly, by telling people to use the meson/ninja build, > > >>> so they get this checking out of the box, without all the headache below? > > >>> > > >> I think bruce noted that was never merged, correct? > > >> > > > Yep, correct. :-( > > > > apologies, was there a reason? > > Because build tool job is building, not checking. > It would be wrong to make (slow) checks mandatory in all builds. > > The need is to enforce checking ABI. > The result is already published by Travis in patchwork and in an > email to the author I believe. > Not checking email and patchwork is not a good excuse. > > Patchwork must be a mandatory read for everybody for all checks > in general. Let's not give up on general CI workflow. > But it would be helpful to at least codify the commands in the example patch into a build target, for the convienience of local checking prior to CI submission, no? Neil > > >