From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, Gavin.Hu@arm.com,
ravi1.kumar@amd.com, g.singh@nxp.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com,
akhil.goyal@nxp.com, johndale@cisco.com, hyonkim@cisco.com,
jingjing.wu@intel.com, wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, rmody@marvell.com,
shshaikh@marvell.com, matan@mellanox.com, shahafs@mellanox.com,
declan.doherty@intel.com, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] x86/eal: gcc 10 ignore stringop-overflow warnings
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:33:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200417093358.GB1701@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200416184549.10747-1-ktraynor@redhat.com>
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 07:45:49PM +0100, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> stringop-overflow warns when it sees a possible overflow
> in a string operation.
>
> In the rte_memcpy functions different branches are taken
> depending on the size. stringop-overflow is raised for the
> branches in the function where it sees the static size of the
> src could be overflowed.
>
> However, in reality a correct size argument and in some cases
> dynamic allocation would ensure that this does not happen.
>
> For example, in the case below for key, the correct path will be
> chosen in rte_memcpy_generic at runtime based on the size argument
> but as some paths in the function could lead to a cast to 32 bytes
> a warning is raised.
>
> In function ‘_mm256_storeu_si256’,
> inlined from ‘rte_memcpy_generic’
> at ../lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy.h:315:2,
> inlined from ‘iavf_configure_rss_key’
> at ../lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy.h:869:10:
>
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/10/include/avxintrin.h:928:8:
> warning: writing 32 bytes into a region of size 1 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
> 928 | *__P = __A;
> | ~~~~~^~~~~
> In file included
> from ../drivers/net/iavf/../../common/iavf/iavf_prototype.h:10,
> from ../drivers/net/iavf/iavf.h:9,
> from ../drivers/net/iavf/iavf_vchnl.c:22:
>
> ../drivers/net/iavf/iavf_vchnl.c:
> In function ‘iavf_configure_rss_key’:
>
> ../drivers/net/iavf/../../common/iavf/virtchnl.h:508:5:
> note: at offset 0 to object ‘key’ with size 1 declared here
> 508 | u8 key[1]; /* RSS hash key, packed bytes */
> | ^~~
>
> Ignore the stringop-overflow warnings for rte_memcpy.h functions.
>
> Bugzilla ID: 394
> Bugzilla ID: 421
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
>
> ---
>
> v2: Change from a global disable to just disabling for x86/rte_memcpy.h
> ---
> lib/librte_eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h b/lib/librte_eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h
> index ba44c4a32..283fb79ba 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h
> @@ -23,4 +23,8 @@ extern "C" {
> #endif
>
> +#if defined(RTE_TOOLCHAIN_GCC) && (GCC_VERSION >= 100000)
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstringop-overflow"
> +#endif
> +
> /**
> * Copy bytes from one location to another. The locations must not overlap.
Does this permanently need to be disabled for all compilation units
including rte_memcpy.h, or can it be used with a push/pop set of pragmas to
only disable for the required functions?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-17 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-25 14:11 [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/2] gcc 10 disable stringop-overflow warning Kevin Traynor
2020-03-25 14:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/2] meson: gcc 10 disable stringop-overflow warnings Kevin Traynor
2020-03-25 14:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 2/2] mk: " Kevin Traynor
2020-03-25 14:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/2] gcc 10 disable stringop-overflow warning Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-31 14:08 ` Kevin Traynor
2020-03-31 14:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-01 11:33 ` Kevin Traynor
2020-04-07 16:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] build: gcc 10 disable stringop-overflow warnings Kevin Traynor
2020-04-10 10:51 ` Kevin Traynor
2020-04-10 13:23 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-04-16 18:43 ` Kevin Traynor
2020-04-16 18:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] x86/eal: gcc 10 ignore " Kevin Traynor
2020-04-17 9:33 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2020-04-17 10:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-17 14:50 ` Kevin Traynor
2020-04-17 12:40 ` Kevin Traynor
2020-04-17 15:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Kevin Traynor
2020-05-06 9:20 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200417093358.GB1701@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=Gavin.Hu@arm.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=hyonkim@cisco.com \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=johndale@cisco.com \
--cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=matan@mellanox.com \
--cc=ravi1.kumar@amd.com \
--cc=rmody@marvell.com \
--cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
--cc=shshaikh@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).