From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com>
Cc: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>,
"john.mcnamara@intel.com" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
"marko.kovacevic@intel.com" <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Asaf Penso <asafp@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: refine ethernet and VLAN flow rule items
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 10:02:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200426100218.35d50cfb@hermes.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR05MB539030712DAB13F748F44A97B6AE0@VI1PR05MB5390.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 09:18:54 +0000
Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com> wrote:
> Thanks, PSB.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2020 5:00 PM
> > To: Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com>; Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>;
> > john.mcnamara@intel.com; marko.kovacevic@intel.com; Thomas Monjalon
> > <thomas@monjalon.net>; ferruh.yigit@intel.com
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Asaf Penso <asafp@mellanox.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: refine ethernet and VLAN flow rule items
> >
> > On 4/23/20 9:30 PM, Dekel Peled wrote:
> > > Specified pattern may be translated in different manner.
> > > For example the pattern "eth / ipv4" can be translated to match
> > > untagged packets only, since the pattern doesn't specify a vlan item.
> >
> > vlan -> VLAN
>
> I will change to uppercase.
>
> >
> > > It can also be translated to match both tagged and untagged packets,
> > > for the same reason.
> > > This patch updates the rte_flow documentation to clearly specify the
> > > required pattern to use.
> > > For example:
> > > To match tagged ipv4 packets, the pattern "eth type is 0x8100 / vlan /
> > > ipv4 / end" should be used.
> >
> > Isn't eth / vlan / ipv4 /end sufficient? What's the difference?
> > I guess later should allow any VLAN TPID, but it is greyish since it is HW
> > dependent.
>
> In the example I wanted to show explicit rule, to emphasize the importance of detailed pattern structure.
>
> >
> > > To match untagged ipv4 packets, the pattern "eth type is 0x0800 /
> > > ipv4 / end" should be used.
> >
> > What about eth / ipv4 / end?
> > Does usage of ipv4 assume that EtherType is 0x0800?
>
> Same as above.
>
> >
> > > To match both tagged and untagged packets, the pattern "eth / end"
> > > should be used.
> >
> > The interesting question is what should be used if I want either tagged or
> > untagged IPv4 packets. I think it worse to mention to make the picture
> > complete.
>
> To match any IPV4 packet, either tagged or untagged, need to apply two rules.
> One for tagged packets and the other for untagged packets.
> I will add this example as well.
>
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com>
All this reminds me that "code is the best documentation" and there
is no working code that does a complete software implementation of the
rte_flow engine. This means the actual interpretation of what the rte_flow
means is left to documentation and hardware vendors choices in implementation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-26 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-23 18:30 Dekel Peled
2020-04-25 14:00 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-04-26 9:18 ` Dekel Peled
2020-04-26 17:02 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2020-04-27 6:52 ` Ori Kam
2020-05-03 7:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Dekel Peled
2020-05-03 9:56 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-05-03 14:57 ` Ori Kam
2020-05-07 14:18 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-05 16:51 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200426100218.35d50cfb@hermes.lan \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=asafp@mellanox.com \
--cc=dekelp@mellanox.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
--cc=orika@mellanox.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).