From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
Sameh Gobriel <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] hash: check flags on creation
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 16:16:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200427231625.10135-3-stephen@networkplumber.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200427231625.10135-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
All API's should check that they support the flag values
passed. If an application passes an invalid flag it could
cause problems in later ABI.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
index 38767a8a164f..d54bbb47edcb 100644
--- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
+++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
@@ -32,6 +32,14 @@
#include "rte_hash.h"
#include "rte_cuckoo_hash.h"
+/* Mask of all flags supported by this version */
+#define RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_MASK (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_TRANS_MEM_SUPPORT | \
+ RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_MULTI_WRITER_ADD | \
+ RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY | \
+ RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE | \
+ RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_NO_FREE_ON_DEL | \
+ RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF)
+
#define FOR_EACH_BUCKET(CURRENT_BKT, START_BUCKET) \
for (CURRENT_BKT = START_BUCKET; \
CURRENT_BKT != NULL; \
@@ -164,6 +172,12 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params)
return NULL;
}
+ if (params->extra_flag & ~RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_MASK) {
+ rte_errno = EINVAL;
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "rte_hash_create: unsupported extra flags\n");
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
/* Validate correct usage of extra options */
if ((params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY) &&
(params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF)) {
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-27 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-12 23:08 [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/4] Enforce flag checking in API's Stephen Hemminger
2020-02-12 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/4] ring: future proof flag settings Stephen Hemminger
2020-02-13 11:12 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-02-12 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 2/4] hash: check flags on creation Stephen Hemminger
2020-02-12 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 3/4] stack: " Stephen Hemminger
2020-02-12 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 4/4] cfgfile: check flags value Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-24 17:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] enforce checking on flag values in API's Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-24 17:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] ring: future proof flag settings Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-24 18:07 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-24 19:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-25 9:20 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-24 17:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] hash: check flags on creation Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-24 17:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] stack: " Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-24 17:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] cfgfile: check flags value Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-27 23:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Enforce checking on flag values in API's Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-27 23:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] ring: future proof flag settings Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-28 4:12 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-27 23:16 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2020-04-29 1:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] hash: check flags on creation Wang, Yipeng1
2020-04-27 23:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] stack: " Stephen Hemminger
2020-05-02 2:36 ` Eads, Gage
2020-04-27 23:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] cfgfile: check flags value Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-28 10:24 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-04-28 10:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Enforce checking on flag values in API's Bruce Richardson
2020-06-16 15:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-28 11:04 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200427231625.10135-3-stephen@networkplumber.org \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
--cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).