DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: bernard.iremonger@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com,
	Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
	stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/flow-classify: fix failure on dual socket systems
Date: Fri,  1 May 2020 12:08:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200501110814.67384-1-harry.van.haaren@intel.com> (raw)

This commit fixes failures of the flow_classify_autotest when
ran on dual-socket servers, as the sample application does not
support more than a single socket. Increasing the NB_SOCKETS
value allows the test to run successfully.

Fixes: 9c9befea4f57 ("test: add flow classify unit tests")

Signed-off-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>

---

DPDK does not provide a RTE_SOCKETS_MAX #define, so we cannot
easily statically allocate the array. As a bugfix patch, I'd
prefer not add complexity of dynamically allocating based on
rte_socket_count(), hence just increasing the value seems the
most pragmatic fix.

Fixes: tag is a bit complex, code was moved in previous commit.
This fixes tag is against when the NB_SOCKET = 1 was introduced.

Cc: stable@dpdk.org

---
 app/test/test_flow_classify.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_flow_classify.c b/app/test/test_flow_classify.c
index ff5265c6a..ef0b6fdd5 100644
--- a/app/test/test_flow_classify.c
+++ b/app/test/test_flow_classify.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
 
 #define FLOW_CLASSIFY_MAX_RULE_NUM 100
 #define MAX_PKT_BURST              32
-#define NB_SOCKETS                 1
+#define NB_SOCKETS                 4
 #define MEMPOOL_CACHE_SIZE         256
 #define MBUF_SIZE                  512
 #define NB_MBUF                    512
-- 
2.17.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-05-01 11:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-01 11:08 Harry van Haaren [this message]
2020-05-01 11:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-05 11:02   ` Iremonger, Bernard
2020-05-11 20:56 ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200501110814.67384-1-harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --to=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).