From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3FBA0524; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:17:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3A21D626; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:17:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC1D1D609 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:17:57 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: B7LVlUVeF0sXq/5flInGGKOi+riRIWEfla7jHdHxRwZYCemxQQpCvezkkJQZt+5U68IY45HbtJ Zz9sGvi/O/ng== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9669"; a="164896653" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,303,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="164896653" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jul 2020 02:17:56 -0700 IronPort-SDR: eHhWpDXGq3WFFu4IMAZKTqAs/2xPnkXpZbC/sMj2JLOS4pCuHAzLjeOFdRbT/mHgzi0l9MsFQA kDY3ve9ikfhQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,303,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="455457405" Received: from unknown (HELO bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com) ([10.252.18.120]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 02 Jul 2020 02:17:55 -0700 Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 10:17:52 +0100 From: Bruce Richardson To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, ndabilpuram@marvell.com Message-ID: <20200702091752.GB611@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20200701180507.2850094-1-thomas@monjalon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200701180507.2850094-1-thomas@monjalon.net> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] build: remove special handling for node library X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 08:05:06PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > What is the point of adding librte_node a second time separately? > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > --- I suspect that this is a hangover from when we did not explicitly link_whole all DPDK libs.