From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, feifei.wang2@arm.com,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] test/ring: add stress test for ST peek API
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 15:10:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200702141027.18447-2-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200702141027.18447-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Introduce new test case to test ST peek API.
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
---
app/test/Makefile | 1 +
app/test/meson.build | 1 +
app/test/test_ring_st_peek_stress.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
app/test/test_ring_stress.c | 3 ++
app/test/test_ring_stress.h | 1 +
5 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 app/test/test_ring_st_peek_stress.c
diff --git a/app/test/Makefile b/app/test/Makefile
index 7b96a03a6..37bdaf891 100644
--- a/app/test/Makefile
+++ b/app/test/Makefile
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ SRCS-y += test_ring_hts_stress.c
SRCS-y += test_ring_perf.c
SRCS-y += test_ring_peek_stress.c
SRCS-y += test_ring_rts_stress.c
+SRCS-y += test_ring_st_peek_stress.c
SRCS-y += test_ring_stress.c
SRCS-y += test_pmd_perf.c
diff --git a/app/test/meson.build b/app/test/meson.build
index b224d6f2b..5cb050958 100644
--- a/app/test/meson.build
+++ b/app/test/meson.build
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ test_sources = files('commands.c',
'test_ring_peek_stress.c',
'test_ring_perf.c',
'test_ring_rts_stress.c',
+ 'test_ring_st_peek_stress.c',
'test_ring_stress.c',
'test_rwlock.c',
'test_sched.c',
diff --git a/app/test/test_ring_st_peek_stress.c b/app/test/test_ring_st_peek_stress.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..bc573de47
--- /dev/null
+++ b/app/test/test_ring_st_peek_stress.c
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+ * Copyright(c) 2020 Intel Corporation
+ */
+
+#include "test_ring_stress_impl.h"
+#include <rte_ring_elem.h>
+
+static inline uint32_t
+_st_ring_dequeue_bulk(struct rte_ring *r, void **obj, uint32_t n,
+ uint32_t *avail)
+{
+ uint32_t m;
+
+ static rte_spinlock_t lck = RTE_SPINLOCK_INITIALIZER;
+
+ rte_spinlock_lock(&lck);
+
+ m = rte_ring_dequeue_bulk_start(r, obj, n, avail);
+ n = (m == n) ? n : 0;
+ rte_ring_dequeue_finish(r, n);
+
+ rte_spinlock_unlock(&lck);
+ return n;
+}
+
+static inline uint32_t
+_st_ring_enqueue_bulk(struct rte_ring *r, void * const *obj, uint32_t n,
+ uint32_t *free)
+{
+ uint32_t m;
+
+ static rte_spinlock_t lck = RTE_SPINLOCK_INITIALIZER;
+
+ rte_spinlock_lock(&lck);
+
+ m = rte_ring_enqueue_bulk_start(r, n, free);
+ n = (m == n) ? n : 0;
+ rte_ring_enqueue_finish(r, obj, n);
+
+ rte_spinlock_unlock(&lck);
+ return n;
+}
+
+static int
+_st_ring_init(struct rte_ring *r, const char *name, uint32_t num)
+{
+ return rte_ring_init(r, name, num, RING_F_SP_ENQ | RING_F_SC_DEQ);
+}
+
+const struct test test_ring_st_peek_stress = {
+ .name = "ST_PEEK",
+ .nb_case = RTE_DIM(tests),
+ .cases = tests,
+};
diff --git a/app/test/test_ring_stress.c b/app/test/test_ring_stress.c
index 853fcc190..387cfa747 100644
--- a/app/test/test_ring_stress.c
+++ b/app/test/test_ring_stress.c
@@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ test_ring_stress(void)
n += test_ring_peek_stress.nb_case;
k += run_test(&test_ring_peek_stress);
+ n += test_ring_st_peek_stress.nb_case;
+ k += run_test(&test_ring_st_peek_stress);
+
printf("Number of tests:\t%u\nSuccess:\t%u\nFailed:\t%u\n",
n, k, n - k);
return (k != n);
diff --git a/app/test/test_ring_stress.h b/app/test/test_ring_stress.h
index 60953ce47..a9a390341 100644
--- a/app/test/test_ring_stress.h
+++ b/app/test/test_ring_stress.h
@@ -36,3 +36,4 @@ extern const struct test test_ring_mpmc_stress;
extern const struct test test_ring_rts_stress;
extern const struct test test_ring_hts_stress;
extern const struct test test_ring_peek_stress;
+extern const struct test test_ring_st_peek_stress;
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-02 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-30 16:21 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Konstantin Ananyev
2020-06-30 23:01 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-01 10:34 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-07-01 14:05 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-02 14:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] extend test coverage for ring PEEK API Konstantin Ananyev
2020-07-02 14:10 ` Konstantin Ananyev [this message]
2020-07-02 16:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] test/ring: add stress test for ST peek API Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-02 14:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/ring: rearrange names for ring stress tests Konstantin Ananyev
2020-07-02 16:18 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-03 1:46 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-07-03 2:37 ` [dpdk-dev] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-03 3:01 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-07-03 10:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] extend test coverage for ring PEEK API David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200702141027.18447-2-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=feifei.wang2@arm.com \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).