From: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>
To: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: fix lcore state bug
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 15:37:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200708133733.29468-1-l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200428012139.32196-1-l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>
The rte_service_lcore_reset_all function stops execution of services
on all lcores and switches them back from ROLE_SERVICE to ROLE_RTE.
However the thread loop for slave lcores (eal_thread_loop) distincts these
roles to set lcore state after processing delegated function.
It sets WAIT state for ROLE_SERVICE, but FINISHED for ROLE_RTE.
So changing the role to RTE before stopping work in slave lcores
causes lcores to end in FINISHED state. That is why the rte_eal_lcore_wait
must be run after rte_service_lcore_reset_all to bring back lcores to
launchable (WAIT) state.
This has been fixed in test app and clarified in API documentation.
Setting the state to WAIT in rte_service_runner_func is premature
as the rte_service_runner_func function is still a part of the lcore
function delegated to slave lcore. The state is overwritten anyway in
slave lcore thread loop. This premature setting state to WAIT might
however cause rte_eal_lcore_wait, that was called by the application,
to return before slave lcore thread set the FINISHED state. That's
why it is removed from librte_eal rte_service_runner_func function.
Bugzilla ID: 464
Fixes: 21698354c832 ("service: introduce service cores concept")
Fixes: f038a81e1c56 ("service: add unit tests")
Cc: harry.van.haaren@intel.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>
---
app/test/test_service_cores.c | 1 +
lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c | 2 --
lib/librte_eal/include/rte_service.h | 4 ++++
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_service_cores.c b/app/test/test_service_cores.c
index 981e21213..6764a5d2c 100644
--- a/app/test/test_service_cores.c
+++ b/app/test/test_service_cores.c
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ unregister_all(void)
}
rte_service_lcore_reset_all();
+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
return TEST_SUCCESS;
}
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c
index 6123a2124..b16698f21 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c
@@ -475,8 +475,6 @@ service_runner_func(void *arg)
cs->loops++;
}
- lcore_config[lcore].state = WAIT;
-
return 0;
}
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/include/rte_service.h b/lib/librte_eal/include/rte_service.h
index 3a1c735c5..e2d0a6dd3 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/include/rte_service.h
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/include/rte_service.h
@@ -304,6 +304,10 @@ int32_t rte_service_lcore_count(void);
* from duty, just unmaps all services / cores, and stops() the service cores.
* The runstate of services is not modified.
*
+ * The cores that are stopped with this call, are in FINISHED state and
+ * the application must take care of bringing them back to a launchable state:
+ * e.g. call *rte_eal_lcore_wait* on the lcore_id.
+ *
* @retval 0 Success
*/
int32_t rte_service_lcore_reset_all(void);
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-08 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20200428012204eucas1p120a84e501d0d64145c21476cd2562f36@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2020-04-28 1:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-04-29 3:11 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-29 15:07 ` Phil Yang
2020-04-29 21:32 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-04-30 2:54 ` Phil Yang
2020-04-30 9:06 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-05-08 16:12 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-05-08 17:04 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-05-18 18:25 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-05-18 18:39 ` David Marchand
2020-05-18 18:43 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-05-20 11:40 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-05-20 12:47 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
[not found] ` <CGME20200708133748eucas1p2dbe34d8605d8f618559daee9cbeaa73d@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2020-07-08 13:37 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski [this message]
2020-07-08 14:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Van Haaren, Harry
2020-07-08 17:10 ` David Marchand
2020-07-08 19:37 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200708133733.29468-1-l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com \
--to=l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).