From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259D0A0540; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 07:41:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15C21C438; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 07:41:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pj1-f65.google.com (mail-pj1-f65.google.com [209.85.216.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DBA1C438 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 07:41:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pj1-f65.google.com with SMTP id gc9so1047109pjb.2 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 22:41:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HfLLqNkLBnntar3HeYV55UfseElPw2+uusJb0fTuP0A=; b=LfK3ZqkJ9cl0EUYxZeq/Pcaq8slazML58SfxEnZdYxQtgsHvKbIGEEJWMyGQangRle ducQKiS4Z1qkOVp9DewSn8IoRmYk33YDaoSpwkrTND6tQ0h0GUT3o7IHvZT7cfXz6snM 6YtV+GGwP28P/Zb41SXQ8neTlJuRT6YQOUEuh709owWbwkI4EE+X/X9Sxf967PAhJhQD VukAnlZOZ33svqmgWDO23RNmANL5w4A9uOcANpJbwHNryr+mwxJm+LP48gryGalE0V0w 3MbzeJuVrpAJIgnvysS/OzmtbqIN2uLCJsXBdbIq98DAbHFSBrbdnwZZ3l0TWPB/L0vT w96g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HfLLqNkLBnntar3HeYV55UfseElPw2+uusJb0fTuP0A=; b=pdbc5687Okq5MOgPzmR/mR8x8/nV313nCWpIBYR9ANUCgpzHs897LvEvwuEFXR9kkg zFj+62g4+PCnfrO1NWtIasXh+fmOLXd6+2C28RzaraUm314NLLIHziaQ0BBb04yn12kb tS2XxY/R1IkmT+DSD5+V0wTNEKg2nFzlmb1K/MF2LnzHOJzSt4+INVWI0DJildlNqvnu Ij1pj40+k1O/EXYD6pzxDCmBabK+dyL0mk/p+m9IzFCDc4OrT6bTkmxT4ID0xx1pWEtp MPoOTL7sZvaWgT1YVs1OJfSDharFiUAjQqwz5R93Mf2/EjEJG0JKgunna7bqoMYxBEK8 V7/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53277ccPcnNnfG/lGqGhyrzprwB364QE2dr4g+uoBnhMwjI6WNm+ 8rhIRxzpsfEnHRJveCuGSkqB1xlVcCCxuw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzEZBf+xiRbzOW/Du7EypY9LLlCv++UpDmO9wkFZa6kfZ+AVMw+bnpbFJ1JB4pizt2npl1tFQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7c10:: with SMTP id x16mr2670329pll.122.1594705296937; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 22:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x22sm16383324pfr.11.2020.07.13.22.41.36 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 22:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 22:41:33 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20200713224133.6b7f72ba@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: <20190724172037.7776-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> References: <20190724172037.7776-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/interrupts: add function to allow interruptible epoll X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:20:37 -0700 Stephen Hemminger wrote: > The existing definition of rte_epoll_wait retries if interrupted > by a signal. This behavior makes it hard to use rte_epoll_wait > for applications that want to use signals do do things like > exit polling loop and shutdown. > > Since changing existing semantic might break applications, add > a new rte_epoll_wait_interruptible() function that does the > same thing as rte_epoll_wait but will return -1 and errno of EINTR > if it receives a signal. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger This patch has been sitting unreviewed, uncommented, and unmerged for two releases. It seems only patches from HW vendors get the attention.