From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A817CA04B0; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 18:28:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4B51C038; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 18:28:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5CB1C034; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 18:28:51 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: p6R/aESfEAzTYdDsLKdC1APRITfJQ4tTE2VyKxeo+KU1+tsT2DWqQwlaQ5r7GzvsItOi9dZgHa hB4byWNcgkxQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9706"; a="141003385" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,446,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="141003385" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Aug 2020 09:28:50 -0700 IronPort-SDR: ZbtT0ubR6qZdPtFiqKAY9WPlVMHrBrqHLOeZnQFYJMdIKVf+AY5MLNqC2+yipxGbAd9jjzO6Ac MJE7biMBcSNw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,446,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="323799702" Received: from sivswdev08.ir.intel.com ([10.237.217.47]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Aug 2020 09:28:48 -0700 From: Konstantin Ananyev To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: jerinj@marvell.com, ruifeng.wang@arm.com, vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com, Konstantin Ananyev , stable@dpdk.org Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:28:23 +0100 Message-Id: <20200807162829.11690-2-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0 In-Reply-To: <20200807162829.11690-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> References: <20200807162829.11690-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 20.11 1/7] acl: fix x86 build when compiler doesn't support AVX2 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Right now we define dummy version of rte_acl_classify_avx2() when both X86 and AVX2 are not detected, though it should be for non-AVX2 case only. Fixes: e53ce4e41379 ("acl: remove use of weak functions") Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev --- lib/librte_acl/rte_acl.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_acl/rte_acl.c b/lib/librte_acl/rte_acl.c index 777ec4d34..715b02359 100644 --- a/lib/librte_acl/rte_acl.c +++ b/lib/librte_acl/rte_acl.c @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ static struct rte_tailq_elem rte_acl_tailq = { }; EAL_REGISTER_TAILQ(rte_acl_tailq) -#ifndef RTE_ARCH_X86 #ifndef CC_AVX2_SUPPORT /* * If the compiler doesn't support AVX2 instructions, @@ -33,6 +32,7 @@ rte_acl_classify_avx2(__rte_unused const struct rte_acl_ctx *ctx, } #endif +#ifndef RTE_ARCH_X86 int rte_acl_classify_sse(__rte_unused const struct rte_acl_ctx *ctx, __rte_unused const uint8_t **data, -- 2.17.1