From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11EC1A04B0; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 22:57:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C49C1C0CD; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 22:57:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lf1-f67.google.com (mail-lf1-f67.google.com [209.85.167.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D811C0BC for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 22:57:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf1-f67.google.com with SMTP id c15so5494839lfi.3 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 13:57:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ao/ME+8iEDl4Q2n7kxcAAZ//Fl7O1YDtSCfgsLVrkHc=; b=SrfYr5D4FKwmRFO1DlUwqnZVfeD0VmA8tpbm2W1TeCjTH4ntEB4vQGeC5W6OZAcpqz wa72rUl1LKm/brJvKCYwRh1nAcQ1qP9b0YgJhkJvwJRsjzaxQkV8e2TXj8FIgbD7I8Kb WxUYkb5SKqkJg8Qh/jNoXIyHuox/luArEb4ecMYYB9Nuqtg5lBQnAmrZDmGOhroaF44B 665qydjnaAbatKT8QMvnOJqLraCMBaCbhwYaY7QIkPZJCKe6MQ6qGtpG3liciIP8pi+p 4gSWvCL41fnPJG2Uni5U8QUe0UkUPjhDHZ5PBLq1uNXRcGv1z3V8Qx58K+/kWQEdWmYv T2hA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ao/ME+8iEDl4Q2n7kxcAAZ//Fl7O1YDtSCfgsLVrkHc=; b=ktRfDU79+2IUUYiCw8L2ldniZNtI6j2johQ21E+UAkXWHVCDIQL9vEuN9a5KJ7xFDB yhjhPalsaPeR6WIhliVY9WFqLJ2mgQ/8vgNZ1MaFvqo3exah81BCUQp4nfinIAZoK+/W /k6UXELTn5l17oeqZYEeTD0lIH6Ef0rIr6cEEjqStuX2rcyIRQ2tS+rFu4BG+aKd1cWp 0Rutmob3kMn0cKOp2oRnTVyC6IeHpmOZbj8F1OqCPsoUfcMBCFXCCDNHbBnjVv1W2s4D LjcT0WQYfXW8MYMFX34OihfqnYd54yzPgLZ/QPooWqzxSWQIyk+eHPfYF/XpVMtEEoDA P/+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532C/J7S1DIMEcEf1yR5mx3I9VcwjxHMn4/aiuOWp9pNhZriEoHE YzoisuhAMTk2DhL6eomFRks= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyVoL7iA2v6VRbx55wU6vGXHnijjCSxvTMAx1FXao015NgQ8JZjasH7XdRCp9tfP6qmVHVJGw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:63:: with SMTP id i3mr2067937lfo.116.1597438676458; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 13:57:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sovereign (broadband-37-110-65-23.ip.moscow.rt.ru. [37.110.65.23]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u5sm2109165lfr.3.2020.08.14.13.57.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 14 Aug 2020 13:57:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 23:57:54 +0300 From: Dmitry Kozlyuk To: Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, haramakr@linux.microsoft.com, ocardona@microsoft.com, pallavi.kadam@intel.com, ranjit.menon@intel.com, dmitrym@microsoft.com, Narcisa Vasile Message-ID: <20200814235754.7b75deef@sovereign> In-Reply-To: <20200814202611.GA96413@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> References: <1597360905-74106-1-git-send-email-navasile@linux.microsoft.com> <20200814230139.62881018@sovereign> <20200814202611.GA96413@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/22] windows/netuio: add netuio driver for Windows X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 13:26:11 -0700, Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 11:01:39PM +0300, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 16:21:23 -0700, Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile wrote: [...] > > As far as I understand, you're importing history from dpdk-draft-repo and > > then changing file layout. Not sure how this is beneficial, especially > > since there are bugfixes along the way. Or are there legal reasons? > > > Harini, Omar, please advise if we need to preserve history. If not, > I think it's better to just squash all commits and send the netuio code > as one patch. In this way, I can easily make sure that this one patch > has the right signoff, description, subject formatting etc. > > Dmitry, would pushing the netuio code as one patch be ok? Yes, I think so.