From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A3FA04B1; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 23:00:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84411C113; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 23:00:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pj1-f53.google.com (mail-pj1-f53.google.com [209.85.216.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2C1255 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 23:00:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pj1-f53.google.com with SMTP id u3so219748pjr.3 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:00:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dbogtjGHkwyfpjLjQ8yOlcVsYpXgfgh4sD7sePfOQ5Q=; b=f/ZQO2FStlyaA4c8WTn/fPL2BsbtFrc5vWWqMivUQltxKeNEk5KEP5Nk8xQ0QqSkb/ AJ918/pc6ctifuX8jvt0VWJNffsuomN0t1kh6CO8CWOjs6PkJivLsxdXFjkBg1XL7efN +n3+kOmcnU3CCzUm2hTidcW+wpxeg4zCmxcFuwFXrfBN2d137sEpc09U9vtA5ZpMi8M8 3FxV2DifghkWZwCmojOlI/hUglLeB7EYq7kuRMWnPvq7nb46HD4UM7cqvlWwTcu5wTlR BEUwqMK91SNQqxvwoOzswn4Pah1C+zGpYOmeTZZG3XM0lh7dY18SScNkMSLpDVY1LHhD Q11w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dbogtjGHkwyfpjLjQ8yOlcVsYpXgfgh4sD7sePfOQ5Q=; b=HlJY7lSEESmczeyhdU/eir1DfNKgF8QCNcVhgFd55EaKnwZ7Hwzywi8SIjUCUxVbrT +ovPPVlURdY6Zl0AP34jjQYeUbKXlbgKlcj7stVIrq2po+VPLYZ/xIn4659TM/PzeBqV UizFxTKWLbTvPSFNyrQZuzmAlshkX6t0HOSLpafX4crmTw+KSI6UgGA8sCjw+j58vmUl PKupQ4M44MbuvW1IcwXAkFh7RKldVn3qsiKPSbQeuPaSQ0xpKZLziYhQC0lq37QPAmSh Ni7htsn2MV2d73Wrg2Y73Zg1V8/4Ss7Es+AIB6TGXg7voHVNf84NDIYt2OGS0U2OQiQv PO7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530p8Q1sHAPkJ5LLKXOAqSckEnUDJlNepWWE7tly5kORGUq6tYgV Pxq7zZX659m66sHqgJUi1mlitQcXbuwGvg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzQ/CyQlM0HHx4Dbgp6OdtUAs4cbdMyj7p05o8oXX9+SB928iuVJSEm9/vK7TNDV/g41gkGKQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:617:: with SMTP id gb23mr602711pjb.36.1599598836981; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:00:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a19sm323589pfn.10.2020.09.08.14.00.36 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:00:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 14:00:28 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20200908140028.2e2a740b@hermes.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [dpdk-dev] Minutes of Technical Board Meeting 2020-07-15 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Members Attending - Bruce - Ferruh - Honnappa - Jerin - Kevin - Konstantin - Olivier - Stephen (chair) - Thomas The technical board meetings takes place every second Wednesday on IRC channel #dpdk-board, at 3pm UTC. Meetings are public and DPDK community members are welcome to attend. Next meeting will be on Wednesday 2020-07-29 @3pm UTC, and will be chaired by Thomas. Coordinating the DPDK virtual Event ----------------------------------- There are about 20 submissions so far for the upcoming DPDK virtual conferences. The plan is for two sessions of 3 hours each. Proposals to be reviewed and finalized in coming weeks. A couple sessions based on techboard interests were proposed. One on getting more involvement and the other is about documentation. Decision for content in the event comes from techboard, but we are open to feedback from any interested party. The final agenda was discussed in a follow on Jitsi call on July 27.2020 Open items for 20.08 -------------------- Nothing special, nothing critical is pending. The global RTE_DEBUG change needs more review and feedback. Rte_atomic deprecation is still waiting for review. Summer is slow maybe DPDK should consider to changing to 3 releases a year? There is no one actively maintaining the documentation. The existing documentation needs restructing and current volunteer model is not enough. Several members expressed desire to get Linux Foundation board to fund someone to be the documentation maintainer. A proposal was made to request/require a unit test for each new feature? This was got unanimous support but more discussion need be for it is made mandatory.