From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2797DA04C7; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:57:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5B71C10C; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:57:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oi1-f193.google.com (mail-oi1-f193.google.com [209.85.167.193]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4612A1C10A for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:57:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oi1-f193.google.com with SMTP id 185so4376126oie.11 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 08:57:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZqxZBZ11q+tTz2ZIqyhDnG+d8FbagLvEWoiYcU/z35M=; b=FVFtAiCvfoX2oLVDAyxLPyx/Q2JJ7GnBBS4HLdPPSAd3iGkOqPQtWwWpM7IFUqIZu+ bR0yshhT8mxuTVF0I/O1YMxKCXVZVIDdPx+0XkLjZ04ayO2+Rrz5QsyfwW22+rq5B6zP YkqvOCRNwIo07f51O73UcmV6HIkoZTwVSy5XZPdVEG2koFDAQr585Lh4d/21kSlM0y08 oGcCJhkwGoU3FyzMtyJbA92zUsXBUef2leSPSVGcP1HUabiNW3L0AJ3bok03NPyHzXSQ Oa8bPEM2NOFGS8SEHNqaXdCSKlHUcRtpG/gPerwtP5BFGsz28I7gqvOZfZRTx6gMK1GU hBkw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZqxZBZ11q+tTz2ZIqyhDnG+d8FbagLvEWoiYcU/z35M=; b=r9KQ+5mte0AVaTTRJk1gi2IhvMPtcxKoGtUumO2cwvnWAfzMflCwwcRaiNCAdNbdw4 3cr1vYdtYYqjd+cTSYBoJcwYpea8T9+tDgZu/LTR3bIrQbazW15sYBJRXzHUmFyDvTs5 9K/7TX6k08FmPcghcpUKrZPPfonNv4rsYz538W1mp7XAqISbKURRCM34tpMVAXBht2Hz WLhVL0kmRBchEct5J7IFjP0qLZMrD4r606MDeQroEUWJ6/2bVKZSWS+ni1+nZ1qbVu7E LSGYRXfKRPJoivlTvUXrQPxv9uxXWQGlSvfQyQ+0gWuawfUObRv++NdWJVAv58izf+Up Jxwg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530UJn2tbaeSQH8WsigIkHYvCzFIttQIQsGJQcxfe7Hpb12kimWr vsxC3Mzig03fAs+kdAjjk8hc0k7WoBST0g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxPgojTZDRLsfaVmtpyeVxXV9yRJKxQDKXXkQlZ+SEnlerdD3pRdVcnqPAgu6uPFtbze03iBQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:198:: with SMTP id t24mr4467047pjs.107.1600181233991; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:47:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k29sm11487407pgf.21.2020.09.15.07.47.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:47:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:47:05 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20200915074705.2fa9cb4a@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: <3dbdbdb8-1e03-72c9-7619-b06048146465@intel.com> References: <20200915020341.28742-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20200915020341.28742-2-stephen@networkplumber.org> <3dbdbdb8-1e03-72c9-7619-b06048146465@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] MAINTAINERS remove experimental tag from vdev_netvsc X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:42:07 +0100 Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 9/15/2020 3:03 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Vdev_netvsc has been around for several years. It no longer needs > > to be marked experimental. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 3b16d7a4b8c8..32db0996181f 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ F: buildtools/options-ibverbs-static.sh > > F: doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst > > F: doc/guides/nics/features/mlx5.ini > > > > -Microsoft vdev_netvsc - EXPERIMENTAL > > +Microsoft vdev_netvsc > > M: Matan Azrad > > F: drivers/net/vdev_netvsc/ > > F: doc/guides/nics/vdev_netvsc.rst > > > > As far as I remember 'vdev_netvsc' was interim solution until 'netvsc' > was ready. In this patchset 'netvsc' is also becoming mature. > > Wouldn't be easier to keep 'vdev_netvsc' experimental to be able to > remove it soon? Let me discuss with Long Li and management. Maybe replace EXPERIMENTAL with DEPRECATED in 20.11.