From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13FBA04C8; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 00:12:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACF21DB2E; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 00:12:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-f193.google.com (mail-pl1-f193.google.com [209.85.214.193]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB561D92E for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 00:12:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-f193.google.com with SMTP id m15so3699100pls.8 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:12:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wJXRtX1PF6bj4r+hHyOP2EEjjZu3guF21McZHfDW8ts=; b=fv2+9Pyplmp8jFPm+8+wny6YUXpYzpjExEDubcgT9t/rq69IN9aPzzcGqrPgcBv8lT KBJSY/mX1VKvmAbFi3hmlVEBW3z/sf37+q8GVJke/mBTZr4AvbpNWia5hrdBwt/6f6sf vkZVi218BlihR9PUoB21LHCkl+qmTeDPqV5narx4YaCoSFvNAcPJ37GsCM8d4y2uBWx+ AczG8jGWA1dPujQ2TdLquUKCmSqFRXpYiBofJo864XqLWt2Oa2g9yuyVpNXXqpjPIeOP LKUH8aFTKA4XYxRiKaIarG9WbQQET8PFJuVSGah6w/Xd4sNwuA+kkLnKtP6ZtzxezsgD XxtA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wJXRtX1PF6bj4r+hHyOP2EEjjZu3guF21McZHfDW8ts=; b=MpuAQ4rn8AtNf/cOl7FrYdyzhUz15SgZ6/4P8kXQn7P14gC/4PiihzvJC9Tz/6nOHN zvw49TT8tgDSfrpIqpNWZcoVrESBTABOZUq62lK5gXhD+E+4D5C3jwxa7zpN/9dPfTPF 2ZHCKBInzW/2TN/NmK0kn2CpCf9n9nh1WkgbGv4ke1fCnUZ9dl4Kxt5vIhNZEmSGZzeE JzZWfltCdNtBxPqdov+z+quLx2jzneWKU3TaCc9SmtrTLUxT47FwJO92anZ49/06lM2T EJ6dnAGR1Y1ef+9p5l46aGXszNRDq4mXwm/cynMjt1c+jdCkCXbpwjZwlbrR2W1ngUWm jPMw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530+zrWefxsw6lvW3E6JWx2vCn8/I9K1jvtHxkayreZVx+p0U/a2 CfCCNdc3c1BamUtW6yHmtensFgxaFVqnnw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxfAydJ/DI6fqi/bUfaJvq3UT6ilw6wkhdFGNh/sxlD1sQpLLELg7VJ5VXR5RdE9MFzbCU40Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7007:b029:d2:4ca:2825 with SMTP id y7-20020a1709027007b02900d204ca2825mr6960003plk.76.1600467158703; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:12:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y203sm4299263pfb.58.2020.09.18.15.12.38 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:12:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:12:35 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20200918151235.60065c57@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: <20200728191330.20864-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> References: <20200506193741.24117-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20200728191330.20864-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/8] app/proc-info enhancements X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:13:22 -0700 Stephen Hemminger wrote: > The current proc-info command is useful for diagnosing issues > with external DPDK applications, but the display is limited > and somewhat ugly. This patchset adds some enhancements which > show more info and suppress unnecessary stuff. > > v5 - add mempool name to queue info > fix trailing whitespace > v4 - incorporate mempool display > modify portmask for handling owned ports > v3 - consolidate chages for displaying crypto info > v2 - fix checkpatch complaints > > Hemant Agrawal (2): > app/proc-info: enhance mempool to print ops name > app/proc-info: add crypto security context info > > Stephen Hemminger (6): > app/proc-info: remove unused logtype #define > app/proc-info: eliminate useless borders > app/proc-info: hide EAL info messages > app/proc-info: add more info to show_ports > app/proc-info: dump rx and tx descriptor info > app/proc-info: provide way to request info on owned ports > > app/proc-info/main.c | 392 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 257 insertions(+), 135 deletions(-) > Why is this still not merged, there is no outstanding feedback, and more patches to proc-info seem to keep coming?