From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9080FA04B5; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 19:12:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439991D54E; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 19:12:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pg1-f196.google.com (mail-pg1-f196.google.com [209.85.215.196]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5581D54E for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 19:12:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg1-f196.google.com with SMTP id d13so12495914pgl.6 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:12:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=scDg4BALzaghJwqWFBKQxGilAw8iHiHh0ILMUdbJRvs=; b=S8uNGpuWeNEITKpmr5fDBybl53E/AgYNzw3gl6T0is5T2n0oobqQUKdQsCB/BRASDN bG6A003T8OF12WBgbPYjvIqtg9SzI22xLdIOo+AFGtuLcdTRpExhNuHkBZy96QxXSCpe NLCn5TldCGVIrvf840prHY1ycrXmpbDJVZ50xNt+J3SZemeow0Wtgagb4PlXCrxCdI+L mulK/6t8e9zsNgG23MRwzQXuic/LPxLV/RlzrwXJ1I1Iclzc+5X4Q6hUefToIBGC0Sjv 77NCg4x160inXpNMbJarfg5PJtBcS3/AElcmFS2K6jQCSxGlp6iJTcbiCMRyFqf+OB3c zhLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=scDg4BALzaghJwqWFBKQxGilAw8iHiHh0ILMUdbJRvs=; b=GTaBONP7omgq/oTO1DHuwgCY6J61MNBmzAHIpJO7cjmatF75tDiSt3nLhCnyDMMba/ ZNYZq2w6DGu2hicm66s2ZGX8/oGOPF5sB4jKzssflavTJINxcfBOgQJfr6hqbUAxiZMS YucpsdqJi5KaO6BLVY28nl13l6WNtktSqvLTXNY4gYF+gSQ2vMKGzKM/B9FltRav9hQN HXP4fm2sl8s3Iwssr3bdLvMzEg7/ol8Hf32Ngsg8E6duN1eq1ILwrSaCvYx+i2WCYeGw 31QRw2uwhPuabxyL/2MtiJMD+BenlNrRYKNVKoZqM2jZ/l05bq/E7jrYYtFP7tmSfEvE 5APQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530RmWlk2ngN+cWyUypDefeOr27U6BYZhABGOt3NkqVjqfBaoObl b5io5l6Ail3DCGbGZaw7G1kY0w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzN9yJ+Cj1U5GOIIy0WumNXToDsdJxvhuFcwYmScpdtYZ4hiGnmBOgpjLmVIuEJhygL0IVikw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bf4b:b029:d1:cc21:985b with SMTP id u11-20020a170902bf4bb02900d1cc21985bmr5829542pls.32.1600794729983; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:12:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h10sm2468379pfh.217.2020.09.22.10.12.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:12:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:12:01 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: David Marchand , techboard@dpdk.org, dev , Luca Boccassi , "Mcnamara, John" Message-ID: <20200922101201.4e3edfad@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: <8969299.nXlkhJugru@thomas> References: <20200613000055.7909-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <9220848.TXtZX9Kk24@thomas> <20200922072846.2b320a52@hermes.lan> <8969299.nXlkhJugru@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] [PATCH v3 00/10] rename blacklist/whitelist to block/allow X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:16:58 +0200 Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 22/09/2020 16:28, Stephen Hemminger: > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:01:27 +0200 > > Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > > 14/07/2020 07:33, Stephen Hemminger: > > > > On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:06:11 +0200 > > > > David Marchand wrote: > > > > > > > > > About deprecating existing API/EAL flags in this release, this should > > > > > go through the standard deprecation process. > > > > > I would go with introducing new options + full compatibility + a > > > > > deprecation notice in the 20.08 release. > > > > > The actual deprecation/API flagging will go in 20.11. > > > > > Removal will come later. > > > > > > > > Like Make deprecation for 20.08 will leave the flags but add nag. > > > > Want to make full removal in 20.11. Otherwise it will end up being 21.11 > > > > which is too far out. > > > > > > Excuse me I may lack a bit of context. > > > Are you asking for removing some EAL options without following > > > the deprecation process? > > > > These were in the 20.08 deprecation notice. > > Do you mean this? > " > The ``master-lcore`` argument to testpmd will be replaced > with ``initial-lcore``. The old ``master-lcore`` argument > will produce a runtime notification in 20.11 release, and > be removed completely in a future release. > " > > Yes, went back to the wrong old thread while looking up the blacklist patches. Just ignore this.