From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1940CA04DD; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 19:08:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8E83772; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 19:08:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pg1-f193.google.com (mail-pg1-f193.google.com [209.85.215.193]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC8C2B93 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 19:08:35 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pg1-f193.google.com with SMTP id i26so10905531pgl.5 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:08:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=A9HvZab5JykjvWbe3Pp0CYfvRexRwVBB+DqhX9ieQlQ=; b=kxwMHpk/7Ksfy1kG0Xq5MPaABTIBC1ZfOeB6r1ZOenGR+KhI8k+qQJ5p9XakYSJntJ ioFc700Pwlas88S9PAyA3sTcpAutDfJ6+HT1jblGYoMg5rO2+/O7MT1mvoojMACUL5KQ onERqQY0lcvbfY/dXB9XtfaE01u/bQOsvJtnuQjD3oKhBxzfeyPX+GwAxypHs852P46Y KePVJqZozOIpL7vCpv/8wNwyLzOzkNRD5mQYWuJfxW8o/nUEtmrChffLC0D53nOqNkU7 lgmOxaADcxQ2pLMXugsoLuAILckq/GwPg/S00A++XjWygEIo3sVPJG16GcCdpfetO+4V IkYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=A9HvZab5JykjvWbe3Pp0CYfvRexRwVBB+DqhX9ieQlQ=; b=fQrMy0GBcWuQ1JzKSKAd6R0nAcVrZOS6v4NvuxGewpzRUhbKBbXuBL5OlU585EU7xq eTUMWp0hi4pz5QW2H6rKtjTqPBfPBCbzL9SCStVH+uK18CrdZp9ITyVKtYETuqirzF5a 5gWYYH06L2ul0TVvcb+10pGWhPwQNHCg9YZt2Odb6S26f9T02KhVHrPhzn+44//LYl0Z VNC/CtzmBCE7RJqly/d0jFkk2HjdKwcd+xcdN7cp1IMDfwVpjphGxZVYX4SMNnDS9P+D GClvipmER/XYIoVAyQuJ4mQq+kt/K1bucoXHlzeU+35Do3VuLOpG6DCyoUevHSkxc9FF He+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531gC9dbzpwkPxdU+7+cQZviKwsR1cuCG3By79RocNGlqND9FY5J oAYZbXtTyfleL+GI5YQe8lNHYA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxCja6Z9+3h+Hshg1NeDwG35dUbPzS+EGhvmzzHWYV/6tqgBkiJoPXuKMprK4Ma9sMT0gKVzw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:ff10:: with SMTP id k16mr6579515pgi.328.1605031713296; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:08:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v23sm3817683pjh.46.2020.11.10.10.08.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:08:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:08:29 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com> Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, mb@smartsharesystems.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, viacheslavo@nvidia.com, ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com, jerinj@marvell.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Message-ID: <20201110100829.4c50e776@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <20201110162509.GN1898@platinum> References: <20201107155306.463148-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20201109212937.989954-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20201109212937.989954-3-thomas@monjalon.net> <20201110162509.GN1898@platinum> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] mbuf: move pool pointer in first half X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:25:09 +0100 Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 10:29:37PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > According to the Technical Board decision > > (http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-November/191859.html), > > the mempool pointer in the mbuf struct is moved > > from the second to the first half. > > It may increase performance in some cases > > on systems having 64-byte cache line, i.e. mbuf split in two cache lines. > > > > Due to this change, tx_offload is moved. > > Hopefully no vector data path is impacted. > > > > Moving this field gives more space to dynfield1 > > while dropping the temporary dynfield0. > > > > This is how the mbuf layout looks like (pahole-style): > > > > word type name byte size > > 0 void * buf_addr; /* 0 + 8 */ > > 1 rte_iova_t buf_iova /* 8 + 8 */ > > /* --- RTE_MARKER64 rearm_data; */ > > 2 uint16_t data_off; /* 16 + 2 */ > > uint16_t refcnt; /* 18 + 2 */ > > uint16_t nb_segs; /* 20 + 2 */ > > uint16_t port; /* 22 + 2 */ > > 3 uint64_t ol_flags; /* 24 + 8 */ > > /* --- RTE_MARKER rx_descriptor_fields1; */ > > 4 uint32_t union packet_type; /* 32 + 4 */ > > uint32_t pkt_len; /* 36 + 4 */ > > 5 uint16_t data_len; /* 40 + 2 */ > > uint16_t vlan_tci; /* 42 + 2 */ > > 5.5 uint64_t union hash; /* 44 + 8 */ > > 6.5 uint16_t vlan_tci_outer; /* 52 + 2 */ > > uint16_t buf_len; /* 54 + 2 */ > > 7 struct rte_mempool * pool; /* 56 + 8 */ > > /* --- RTE_MARKER cacheline1; */ > > 8 struct rte_mbuf * next; /* 64 + 8 */ > > 9 uint64_t union tx_offload; /* 72 + 8 */ > > 10 struct rte_mbuf_ext_shared_info * shinfo; /* 80 + 8 */ > > 11 uint16_t priv_size; /* 88 + 2 */ > > uint16_t timesync; /* 90 + 2 */ > > 11.5 uint32_t dynfield1[9]; /* 92 + 36 */ > > 16 /* --- END 128 */ > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> > > Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com> Thanks this looks good. Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>