From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com,
mb@smartsharesystems.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com,
andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, viacheslavo@nvidia.com,
ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com, jerinj@marvell.com,
hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] mbuf: move pool pointer in first half
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:25:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201110162509.GN1898@platinum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201109212937.989954-3-thomas@monjalon.net>
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 10:29:37PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> According to the Technical Board decision
> (http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-November/191859.html),
> the mempool pointer in the mbuf struct is moved
> from the second to the first half.
> It may increase performance in some cases
> on systems having 64-byte cache line, i.e. mbuf split in two cache lines.
>
> Due to this change, tx_offload is moved.
> Hopefully no vector data path is impacted.
>
> Moving this field gives more space to dynfield1
> while dropping the temporary dynfield0.
>
> This is how the mbuf layout looks like (pahole-style):
>
> word type name byte size
> 0 void * buf_addr; /* 0 + 8 */
> 1 rte_iova_t buf_iova /* 8 + 8 */
> /* --- RTE_MARKER64 rearm_data; */
> 2 uint16_t data_off; /* 16 + 2 */
> uint16_t refcnt; /* 18 + 2 */
> uint16_t nb_segs; /* 20 + 2 */
> uint16_t port; /* 22 + 2 */
> 3 uint64_t ol_flags; /* 24 + 8 */
> /* --- RTE_MARKER rx_descriptor_fields1; */
> 4 uint32_t union packet_type; /* 32 + 4 */
> uint32_t pkt_len; /* 36 + 4 */
> 5 uint16_t data_len; /* 40 + 2 */
> uint16_t vlan_tci; /* 42 + 2 */
> 5.5 uint64_t union hash; /* 44 + 8 */
> 6.5 uint16_t vlan_tci_outer; /* 52 + 2 */
> uint16_t buf_len; /* 54 + 2 */
> 7 struct rte_mempool * pool; /* 56 + 8 */
> /* --- RTE_MARKER cacheline1; */
> 8 struct rte_mbuf * next; /* 64 + 8 */
> 9 uint64_t union tx_offload; /* 72 + 8 */
> 10 struct rte_mbuf_ext_shared_info * shinfo; /* 80 + 8 */
> 11 uint16_t priv_size; /* 88 + 2 */
> uint16_t timesync; /* 90 + 2 */
> 11.5 uint32_t dynfield1[9]; /* 92 + 36 */
> 16 /* --- END 128 */
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-10 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-07 15:53 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] " Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-07 17:12 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-07 18:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-07 19:05 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-07 20:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-09 5:18 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-09 8:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-09 8:27 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-09 9:47 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-11-09 12:01 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-09 12:59 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-09 13:35 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-09 14:02 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-09 14:08 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-09 14:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-09 14:53 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-09 8:16 ` Morten Brørup
2020-11-09 10:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] " Bruce Richardson
2020-11-09 10:21 ` Morten Brørup
2020-11-09 18:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-11-10 7:15 ` Morten Brørup
2020-11-07 18:57 ` [dpdk-dev] " Morten Brørup
2020-11-09 10:08 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-11-09 10:30 ` Morten Brørup
2020-11-09 10:33 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-11-09 10:36 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-11-09 11:24 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-11-09 21:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] move mbuf pool pointer Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-09 21:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] drivers: disable OCTEON TX2 in 32-bit build Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-10 18:05 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-09 21:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] mbuf: move pool pointer in first half Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-10 10:05 ` Morten Brørup
2020-11-10 10:44 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-10 16:25 ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2020-11-10 18:06 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-12 14:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-10 18:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201110162509.GN1898@platinum \
--to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).