From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B1CA04B5; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 18:20:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C46554AE; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 18:20:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-lf1-f66.google.com (mail-lf1-f66.google.com [209.85.167.66]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60AF2BBD; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 18:20:28 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-lf1-f66.google.com with SMTP id o13so1127636lfr.3; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 09:20:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=t5m7875aHc+1T3xYGP0ivf84qI1k3hLXpADWO06A2Ks=; b=XjTJxOZyOtAZK6G0rrxOYEWxtG6DlmC6shcGwIAs6TK+0CVy9LhCha3aCot+7gGxTH AgQVtH3NGMYjA0watkn8QBxCpSdUOY8ariOBJgfRVKWCOxwFbyWAPako5/eQtKqPICpf o98DERv5Vj4y5VzhXfW2pItfNwZ5XAfTFGCATIF0o2kUOQrq8IShlJlv2HwuTuQBT1rP uWdOBeQ4He4kCXCifnPNarRpmY/BxqxbuOEppLxDDgQPnjyUxAXsfbpLO7TEFNIhJhr6 D93T0Q4TWPj80BgiKx9ibsHPUdRKZVQt3ocO2kyww/hiHwncx2VumtGzhIgPp3LVCod6 wIzA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=t5m7875aHc+1T3xYGP0ivf84qI1k3hLXpADWO06A2Ks=; b=MIhUm9Q6pWhxCvQQJr5bcRqv8w8kRku71pgF+gtZVbfjYPZ/IK1IGvBrdDk6/MmVSl EFaL7GQZqC1Q8+0EILVeK7rxYBs6iggd9Fe09FWDXlKqHzOBstHQslDbcsIDsLR30Xwo phlFP7Fg3ITMu3NxEPlMSXidLbbFGys9y6yGz6bjGu3zrbBsSQKmow7ztW7xLm4xeEwL mPYeq5dYVl/pxcEb6MLQlLfDbkBzIBUyttG4d9C/ubKCe41YgH8VGNJRMyRIWhWRSOrT Z7XafMoPzQlEsafpi147P45LDrOTVvcE1/mgVj6WsgDhNq3NsR76RgFbvcLYDSn5h/dj SApw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53053IFO0JV120CalujXFtq1wLnfiFOKdlvD6qorLr55o2YJzZ9S znU9gudb6kUhn+nuTQMXl+Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxG+N+XBXpKYvEJjACCt1I7trlWa+Tr1mb6YKhdvWSJ8hRrbHy4HXGf0fgQ6BNmDhpXmXjPqw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:2103:: with SMTP id q3mr1869795lfr.404.1607880027248; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 09:20:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from sovereign (broadband-37-110-65-23.ip.moscow.rt.ru. [37.110.65.23]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f63sm1116283lfd.308.2020.12.13.09.20.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 13 Dec 2020 09:20:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 20:20:25 +0300 From: Dmitry Kozlyuk To: Tal Shnaiderman Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, pallavi.kadam@intel.com, navasile@linux.microsoft.com, dmitrym@microsoft.com, odia@nvidia.com, stable@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20201213202025.0405f20e@sovereign> In-Reply-To: <20201213141604.12560-1-talshn@nvidia.com> References: <20201213141604.12560-1-talshn@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.6 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci/windows: do not fail on missing NUMA node for PCIe X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 16:16:04 +0200, Tal Shnaiderman wrote: > On older processors, NUMA isn't bound to PCIe locality. > those cases return ERROR_NOT_FOUND in response to the > SetupDiGetDevicePropertyW call with DEVPKEY_Device_Numa_Node > attribute. > > This error fails the probe process for the PCIe device. > this commit will ignore such failure and will set the > numa_node to 0. > > Fixes: b762221ac24f ("bus/pci: support Windows with bifurcated drivers") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Reported-by: Odi Assli > Signed-off-by: Tal Shnaiderman Acked-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk