From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, DPDK Techboard <techboard@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Minutes of Technical Board Meeting, 2020-12-16
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 08:52:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210104075226.GH2631@platinum> (raw)
Minutes of Technical Board Meeting, 2020-12-16
Members Attending
-----------------
- Bruce
- Ferruh
- Hemant
- Honnappa
- Jerin
- Kevin
- Konstantin
- Maxime
- Olivier (chair)
- Stephen
- Thomas
NOTE: The technical board meetings every second Wednesday on Jitsi [0]
at 3pm UTC. Meetings are public and DPDK community members are welcome
to attend.
NOTE: Next meeting will be on Wednesday 2021-01-13 @3pm UTC, and will be
chaired by Stephen.
1/ Lab investments
==================
Did current 101k /year investment reach the goal we set up earlier?
-------------------------------------------------------------------
- The lab is currently used for performance tests, CI
- It helped to find some functional bugs
- It is needed for baremetal tests or performance tests (which cannot be
done by a cloud test infrastructure)
- The infrastructure is there, we can use it better
Governing board asks about the proposal to add 30k /year to increase coverage
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposal is to increase from 20 to 40 hours per week coverage,
adding 2 more student employees.
One issue now is there is one person every 2 days. Is it possible to
have the same coverage hours, but having an every-day presence?
Governing board asks Techboard to come with a single name as lab owner
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A lab owner is a project manager that tracks what was agreed to do, and
find some help if needed. Ideally, it is a technical person used to
develop in DPDK.
No good solution was found. The following ideas have been mentioned:
a/ Round-robin from techboard? A quarterly basis is too short compared
to ramp-up time, and longer periods are too long for one person.
b/ Can it be managed by Linux Foundation? (maybe ask Trishan?)
c/ Nobody
Question to ask to Govboard:
- What is the detail of the costs (infrastructure, electricity, people)?
Distributed CI should be high priority, therefore sharing test scripts
is important. It might be easier for a company to pay someone working in
its own lab.
2/ Offline documentation (.pdf) support
=======================================
We can provide an offline-html (archive) format. Indeed, pdf is hard to
maintain, and html is a better format (can be interactive with CSS,
links between different guides, ...).
3/ DPDK build configuration - future enhancements
=================================================
AR to Bruce to create initial version of the DD.
No progress yet.
4/ Asia DPDK Event status
=========================
- CFP should be ready (waiting for translation in mandarin)
- Moderators
- AR: Techboard members to contact chineese colleagues and see who could
be interrested in moderating
- ~4 people are needed.
Ruifeng (arm) and Song (arm) kindly volunteered
5/ List of supported OS
=======================
Which distributions should be tested?
In user guide, there is no such list. It looks easier to just advertise
what we test.
6/ List of OS to test in the community lab (compilation and functional)
=======================================================================
- For compilation test: a long distribution list is possible
- For functional / performance test: test some distributions, for
instance: ubuntu-20.04, ubuntu-18.04, RHEL8, FreeBSD latest stable,
Windows
7/ Plan for KNI (deprecate? move?)
==================================
Postponed to next meeting
8/ Position regarding TRex using a DPDK fork
============================================
Postponed to next meeting
9/ Update on DTS usability
==========================
Postponed to next meeting
next reply other threads:[~2021-01-04 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-04 7:52 Olivier Matz [this message]
2021-01-12 15:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210104075226.GH2631@platinum \
--to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).