From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5DFA04B5; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 02:32:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A1C140D8E; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 02:32:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C56B140D75 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 02:32:39 +0100 (CET) Received: by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1086) id 75A0720B6C40; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:32:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 75A0720B6C40 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1610415158; bh=Zr+KYPtzPXXLmu9iqWSrDcd6elflvGVqFqrnYwpdJjg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=DoqJwpYy5MJLsjqOlbeNTZrSKTWrenGPpCmorK2u2+vwGq+K5SFgDXBzTe2OC7yjn KotxsPRzROMVEDNuFJTVcL4NJN3wLhCMeIVQCtpFG+J+blFpTJlKFSraL0QF1RrMFV RuhIqYlmnJBQF4RqtKhBzfoTa+mvUBevqw8B7NtE= Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:32:38 -0800 From: Tyler Retzlaff To: Dmitry Kozlyuk Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, Pallavi Kadam , Khoa To Message-ID: <20210112013238.GA10665@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> References: <1610408246-29482-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> <20210112041534.1402eaa3@sovereign> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210112041534.1402eaa3@sovereign> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] metrics/windows: build rte_metrics library X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 04:15:34AM +0300, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote: > + Pallavi, Khoa > > What's the future plan? Once we talked about a script that would inspect > objects and filter missing functions from the list in .map to build .def. Is > MSFT working on it? Or do we choose another way? MSFT has a task tracking work to resolve this. We agree it is cumbersome to try and keep the .map and .def files in sync by hand.