From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55BB6A052A; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:32:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB47140FB5; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:32:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CA2140F8C for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:32:39 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: xL3oWJw3tMTr1mMYrbocejNT1WovhMje+MVzdLqMz/ADw2wqaHJ/x6hvXbe00orYX/dMiS9jfy 57hltyKct0uw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9876"; a="177348757" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,375,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="177348757" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Jan 2021 07:32:34 -0800 IronPort-SDR: jrZEaxhJliwBmMz0BDeb+DgW4jCFy7g+1ZWf4cDq3q90TPGQNtBH6WJn7VxEblqtVVs0r0fjO3 K2o5yovENsoQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,375,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="429745465" Received: from bricha3-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.252.19.198]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 26 Jan 2021 07:32:33 -0800 Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:32:30 +0000 From: Bruce Richardson To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ruifeng Wang , Juraj =?utf-8?Q?Linke=C5=A1?= Message-ID: <20210126153230.GD239@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20210126150722.4018058-1-thomas@monjalon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210126150722.4018058-1-thomas@monjalon.net> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] doc: fix build X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:07:22PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > When removing the label "arm_cross_build_getting_the_prerequisite_library" > in the rework of cross_build_dpdk_for_arm64.rst, > the reference to this section got broken. > It went unnoticed because "ninja -C doc" does not regenerate the file > which is referencing the changed file. > Do we know why this is? The doc builds should be doing proper dependency tracking, based off the output from sphinx IIRC.