From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366BCA0548; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 11:55:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D901F140EF2; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 11:52:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0291B140F1D for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 11:52:01 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1617270721; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NFgl6XsTYWXol3fiw/yy08sHQJ1hbvyomAtsBYcOyw0=; b=WoMUzmpccPl1dlNSik0WWXG84CRC3PRo6+R51WynQgm6f6m7+anLBarYDtPKMPfyWEOiFD muLWXkKfkEpESnmlcIWgqITvIoRWo3NzpN+pXX7QForvq4R4dX++MG6nqVjYhT4qQjbUEE 9clU60g6s4kevOeaiWf0nKuoW1UerNA= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-64-Woat4U1OMla7rMvnrYhZow-1; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 05:51:59 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Woat4U1OMla7rMvnrYhZow-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E938D801814; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dmarchan.remote.csb (unknown [10.40.193.239]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B637444EF; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:51:52 +0000 (UTC) From: David Marchand To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com, fbl@sysclose.org, i.maximets@ovn.org Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 11:51:34 +0200 Message-Id: <20210401095140.17946-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=david.marchand@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] Offload flags fixes X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" The important part is the last patch on vhost handling of offloading requests coming from a virtio guest interface. The rest are small fixes that I accumulated while reviewing the mbuf offload flags. On this last patch, it has the potential of breaking existing applications using the vhost library (OVS being impacted). I did not mark it for backport, but I am having second thoughts. The vhost example has not been updated yet, as I wanted to send this series first to get feedback before looking more into the example code. -- David Marchand David Marchand (5): mbuf: mark old offload flag as deprecated net/tap: do not touch Tx offload flags net/virtio: do not touch Tx offload flags net/virtio: refactor Tx offload helper vhost: fix offload flags in Rx path drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 17 ++- drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c | 7 +- drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_avx.h | 2 +- drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_neon.h | 2 +- drivers/net/virtio/virtqueue.h | 81 +++++----- examples/vhost/main.c | 6 + lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h | 3 +- lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c | 148 ++++++++----------- 8 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 143 deletions(-) -- 2.23.0