From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, fbl@sysclose.org,
i.maximets@ovn.org, Keith Wiles <keith.wiles@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] net/tap: do not touch Tx offload flags
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 09:53:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210408075352.GR1650@platinum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210401095243.18211-3-david.marchand@redhat.com>
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:52:40AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> Tx offload flags are of the application responsibility.
> Leave the mbuf alone and check for TSO where needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Maybe the problem being solved should be better described in the commit
log. Is it a problem (other than cosmetic) to touch a mbuf in the Tx
function of a driver, where we could expect that the mbuf is owned by
the driver?
The only problem I can think about is in case we transmit a direct mbuf
whose refcnt is increased, but I wonder how much this is really
supported: for instance, several drivers add vlans using
rte_vlan_insert() in their Tx path.
> ---
> drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> index c36d4bf76e..285fe395c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> @@ -562,6 +562,7 @@ tap_tx_l3_cksum(char *packet, uint64_t ol_flags, unsigned int l2_len,
> uint16_t *l4_phdr_cksum, uint32_t *l4_raw_cksum)
> {
> void *l3_hdr = packet + l2_len;
> + uint64_t csum_l4;
>
> if (ol_flags & (PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_IPV4)) {
> struct rte_ipv4_hdr *iph = l3_hdr;
> @@ -571,13 +572,17 @@ tap_tx_l3_cksum(char *packet, uint64_t ol_flags, unsigned int l2_len,
> cksum = rte_raw_cksum(iph, l3_len);
> iph->hdr_checksum = (cksum == 0xffff) ? cksum : ~cksum;
> }
> - if (ol_flags & PKT_TX_L4_MASK) {
> +
> + csum_l4 = ol_flags & PKT_TX_L4_MASK;
> + if (ol_flags & PKT_TX_TCP_SEG)
> + csum_l4 |= PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM;
> + if (csum_l4) {
> void *l4_hdr;
>
> l4_hdr = packet + l2_len + l3_len;
> - if ((ol_flags & PKT_TX_L4_MASK) == PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM)
> + if (csum_l4 == PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM)
> *l4_cksum = &((struct rte_udp_hdr *)l4_hdr)->dgram_cksum;
> - else if ((ol_flags & PKT_TX_L4_MASK) == PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM)
> + else if (csum_l4 == PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM)
> *l4_cksum = &((struct rte_tcp_hdr *)l4_hdr)->cksum;
> else
> return;
> @@ -648,7 +653,8 @@ tap_write_mbufs(struct tx_queue *txq, uint16_t num_mbufs,
> if (txq->csum &&
> ((mbuf->ol_flags & (PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_IPV4) ||
> (mbuf->ol_flags & PKT_TX_L4_MASK) == PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM ||
> - (mbuf->ol_flags & PKT_TX_L4_MASK) == PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM))) {
> + (mbuf->ol_flags & PKT_TX_L4_MASK) == PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM) ||
> + (mbuf->ol_flags & PKT_TX_TCP_SEG))) {
> is_cksum = 1;
>
> /* Support only packets with at least layer 4
> @@ -742,9 +748,6 @@ pmd_tx_burst(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
> if (tso) {
> struct rte_gso_ctx *gso_ctx = &txq->gso_ctx;
>
> - /* TCP segmentation implies TCP checksum offload */
> - mbuf_in->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM;
> -
> /* gso size is calculated without RTE_ETHER_CRC_LEN */
> hdrs_len = mbuf_in->l2_len + mbuf_in->l3_len +
> mbuf_in->l4_len;
> --
> 2.23.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-08 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-01 9:52 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] Offload flags fixes David Marchand
2021-04-01 9:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] mbuf: mark old offload flag as deprecated David Marchand
2021-04-07 20:14 ` Flavio Leitner
2021-04-08 7:23 ` Olivier Matz
2021-04-08 8:41 ` David Marchand
2021-04-01 9:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] net/tap: do not touch Tx offload flags David Marchand
2021-04-07 20:15 ` Flavio Leitner
2021-04-08 7:41 ` Olivier Matz
2021-04-08 11:21 ` Flavio Leitner
2021-04-08 12:05 ` Olivier Matz
2021-04-08 12:58 ` Flavio Leitner
2021-04-09 13:30 ` Olivier Matz
2021-04-09 16:55 ` Flavio Leitner
2021-04-28 12:17 ` David Marchand
2021-04-08 12:16 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-04-08 7:53 ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2021-04-28 12:12 ` David Marchand
2021-04-01 9:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] net/virtio: " David Marchand
2021-04-13 14:17 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-01 9:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] net/virtio: refactor Tx offload helper David Marchand
2021-04-08 13:05 ` Flavio Leitner
2021-04-09 2:31 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-01 9:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] vhost: fix offload flags in Rx path David Marchand
2021-04-08 8:28 ` Olivier Matz
2021-04-08 18:38 ` Flavio Leitner
2021-04-13 15:27 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-27 17:09 ` David Marchand
2021-04-27 17:19 ` David Marchand
2021-04-29 8:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] Offload flags fixes David Marchand
2021-04-29 8:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] mbuf: mark old offload flag as deprecated David Marchand
2021-04-29 12:14 ` Lance Richardson
2021-04-29 16:45 ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-29 8:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] net/virtio: do not touch Tx offload flags David Marchand
2021-04-29 13:51 ` Flavio Leitner
2021-04-29 8:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] net/virtio: refactor Tx offload helper David Marchand
2021-04-29 12:59 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-29 8:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] vhost: fix offload flags in Rx path David Marchand
2021-04-29 13:30 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-29 13:31 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-29 20:21 ` David Marchand
2021-04-30 8:38 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-29 20:09 ` David Marchand
2021-04-29 18:39 ` Flavio Leitner
2021-04-29 19:18 ` David Marchand
2021-05-03 13:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Offload flags fixes David Marchand
2021-05-03 13:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] mbuf: mark old offload flag as deprecated David Marchand
2021-05-03 14:02 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-05-03 14:12 ` David Marchand
2021-05-03 13:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] net/virtio: do not touch Tx offload flags David Marchand
2021-05-03 13:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] net/virtio: refactor Tx offload helper David Marchand
2021-05-03 13:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] vhost: fix offload flags in Rx path David Marchand
2021-05-03 15:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Offload flags fixes Maxime Coquelin
2021-05-03 16:21 ` David Marchand
2021-05-03 16:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] " David Marchand
2021-05-03 16:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] net/virtio: do not touch Tx offload flags David Marchand
2021-05-03 16:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] net/virtio: refactor Tx offload helper David Marchand
2021-05-03 16:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] vhost: fix offload flags in Rx path David Marchand
2021-05-04 11:07 ` Flavio Leitner
2021-05-08 6:24 ` Wang, Yinan
2021-05-12 3:29 ` Wang, Yinan
2021-05-12 15:20 ` David Marchand
2021-05-13 6:34 ` Wang, Yinan
2021-05-04 8:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] Offload flags fixes Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210408075352.GR1650@platinum \
--to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fbl@sysclose.org \
--cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
--cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).