From: Stanislaw Kardach <kda@semihalf.com>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Stanislaw Kardach <kda@semihalf.com>,
phil.yang@arm.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] stack: add lock-free support indication
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:29:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210412082901.652736-3-kda@semihalf.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210412082901.652736-1-kda@semihalf.com>
Currently it is impossible to detect programatically whether lock-free
implementation of rte_stack is supported. One could check whether the
header guard for lock-free stubs is defined (_RTE_STACK_LF_STUBS_H_) but
that's an unstable implementation detail. Because of that currently all
lock-free ring creations silently succeed (as long as the stack header
is 16B long) which later leads to push and pop operations being NOPs.
The observable effect is that stack_lf_autotest fails on platforms not
supporting the lock-free. Instead it should just skip the lock-free test
altogether.
This commit adds a new errno value (ENOTSUP) that may be returned by
rte_stack_create() to indicate that a given combination of flags is not
supported on a current platform.
This is detected by checking a compile-time flag in the include logic in
rte_stack_lf.h which may be used by applications to check the lock-free
support at compile time.
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Kardach <kda@semihalf.com>
Fixes: 7911ba0473e0 ("stack: enable lock-free implementation for aarch64")
Cc: phil.yang@arm.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
---
doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst | 4 ++++
lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.c | 4 +++-
lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.h | 1 +
lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf.h | 5 +++++
4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst
index 6f5858c8f..42ed60da8 100644
--- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst
@@ -166,6 +166,10 @@ API Changes
* pci: The value ``PCI_ANY_ID`` is marked as deprecated
and can be replaced with ``RTE_PCI_ANY_ID``.
+* Lock-free ``rte_stack`` no longer silently ignores push and pop when it's not
+ supported on the current platform. Instead ``rte_stack_create()`` fails and
+ ``rte_errno`` is set to ``ENOTSUP``.
+
ABI Changes
-----------
diff --git a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.c b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.c
index 8a51fba17..10d3b2eeb 100644
--- a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.c
+++ b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.c
@@ -64,9 +64,11 @@ rte_stack_create(const char *name, unsigned int count, int socket_id,
#ifdef RTE_ARCH_64
RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct rte_stack_lf_head) != 16);
-#else
+#endif
+#if !defined(RTE_STACK_LF_SUPPORTED)
if (flags & RTE_STACK_F_LF) {
STACK_LOG_ERR("Lock-free stack is not supported on your platform\n");
+ rte_errno = ENOTSUP;
return NULL;
}
#endif
diff --git a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.h b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.h
index b82c74e72..27640f87b 100644
--- a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.h
+++ b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.h
@@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ rte_stack_free_count(struct rte_stack *s)
* - EEXIST - a stack with the same name already exists
* - ENOMEM - insufficient memory to create the stack
* - ENAMETOOLONG - name size exceeds RTE_STACK_NAMESIZE
+ * - ENOTSUP - platform does not support given flags combination.
*/
struct rte_stack *
rte_stack_create(const char *name, unsigned int count, int socket_id,
diff --git a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf.h b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf.h
index eb106e64e..f2b012cd0 100644
--- a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf.h
+++ b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf.h
@@ -13,6 +13,11 @@
#else
#include "rte_stack_lf_generic.h"
#endif
+
+/**
+ * Indicates that RTE_STACK_F_LF is supported.
+ */
+#define RTE_STACK_LF_SUPPORTED
#endif
/**
--
2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-12 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-12 8:28 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] add lock-free stack support discovery Stanislaw Kardach
2021-04-12 8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] stack: update lock-free supported archs Stanislaw Kardach
2021-04-27 13:54 ` Olivier Matz
2021-04-12 8:29 ` Stanislaw Kardach [this message]
2021-04-27 13:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] stack: add lock-free support indication Olivier Matz
2021-04-12 8:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] test: run lock-free stack tests when supported Stanislaw Kardach
2021-04-27 13:55 ` Olivier Matz
2021-04-16 6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] add lock-free stack support discovery David Marchand
2021-04-19 14:44 ` Stanisław Kardach
2021-05-03 14:21 ` David Marchand
2021-05-03 14:28 ` Olivier Matz
2021-05-03 18:34 ` Stanisław Kardach
2021-05-04 6:44 ` David Marchand
2021-05-04 6:44 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210412082901.652736-3-kda@semihalf.com \
--to=kda@semihalf.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=phil.yang@arm.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).