From: ohilyard@iol.unh.edu
To: vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stephen@networkplumber.org,
david.marchand@redhat.com, Owen Hilyard <ohilyard@iol.unh.edu>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] lib/rte_rib6: fix stack buffer overflow
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:18:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210616181833.356159-1-ohilyard@iol.unh.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210616160730.348523-1-ohilyard@iol.unh.edu>
From: Owen Hilyard <ohilyard@iol.unh.edu>
ASAN found a stack buffer overflow in lib/rib/rte_rib6.c:get_dir.
The fix for the stack buffer overflow was to make sure depth
was always < 128, since when depth = 128 it caused the index
into the ip address to be 16, which read off the end of the array.
While trying to solve the buffer overflow, I noticed that a few
changes could be made to remove the for loop entirely.
Fixes: f7e861e21c ("rib: support IPv6")
Signed-off-by: Owen Hilyard <ohilyard@iol.unh.edu>
---
lib/rib/rte_rib6.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/rib/rte_rib6.c b/lib/rib/rte_rib6.c
index f6c55ee45..a4daf12ca 100644
--- a/lib/rib/rte_rib6.c
+++ b/lib/rib/rte_rib6.c
@@ -79,20 +79,31 @@ is_covered(const uint8_t ip1[RTE_RIB6_IPV6_ADDR_SIZE],
static inline int
get_dir(const uint8_t ip[RTE_RIB6_IPV6_ADDR_SIZE], uint8_t depth)
{
- int i = 0;
- uint8_t p_depth, msk;
-
- for (p_depth = depth; p_depth >= 8; p_depth -= 8)
- i++;
-
- msk = 1 << (7 - p_depth);
- return (ip[i] & msk) != 0;
+ uint8_t index, msk;
+
+ /* depth & 127 clamps depth to values that will not
+ * read off the end of ip.
+ * depth is the number of bits deep into ip to traverse, and
+ * is incremented in blocks of 8 (1 byte). This means the last
+ * 3 bits are irrelevant to what the index of ip should be.
+ */
+ index = (depth & 127) >> 3;
+
+ /*
+ * msk is the bitmask used to extract the bit used to decide the
+ * direction of the next step of the binary search.
+ */
+ msk = 1 << (7 - (depth & 7));
+
+ return (ip[index] & msk) != 0;
}
static inline struct rte_rib6_node *
get_nxt_node(struct rte_rib6_node *node,
const uint8_t ip[RTE_RIB6_IPV6_ADDR_SIZE])
{
+ if (node->depth == 128)
+ return NULL;
return (get_dir(ip, node->depth)) ? node->right : node->left;
}
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-16 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-16 16:07 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " ohilyard
2021-06-16 16:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-06-16 17:27 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2021-06-16 18:18 ` ohilyard [this message]
2021-06-18 16:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Medvedkin, Vladimir
2021-06-18 16:27 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2021-06-21 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " ohilyard
2021-06-22 7:10 ` David Marchand
2021-06-22 10:51 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2021-06-23 15:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] rib: fix max depth IPv6 lookup ohilyard
2021-06-24 13:23 ` David Marchand
2021-06-24 9:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] lib/rte_rib6: fix stack buffer overflow Medvedkin, Vladimir
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210616181833.356159-1-ohilyard@iol.unh.edu \
--to=ohilyard@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).