From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803BEA0C41; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 05:56:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B30440E09; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 05:56:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7849D40E09; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 05:56:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8E331B; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 20:56:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wls-arm-cavium06.shanghai.arm.com (wls-arm-cavium06.shanghai.arm.com [10.169.206.120]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 231533F694; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 20:56:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Richael Zhuang To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: yux.jiang@intel.com, richael.zhuang@arm.com, stable@dpdk.org, David Hunt Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 11:55:41 +0800 Message-Id: <20210623035541.50543-3-richael.zhuang@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20210623035541.50543-1-richael.zhuang@arm.com> References: <20210512035709.37755-2-richael.zhuang@arm.com> <20210623035541.50543-1-richael.zhuang@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] test/power: round cpuinfo cur freq only when using CPPC cpufreq X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On arm platform, the value in "/sys/.../cpuinfo_cur_freq" may not be exactly the same as what was set when using CPPC cpufreq driver. For other cpufreq driver, no need to round it currently, or else this check will fail with turbo enabled. For example, with acpi_cpufreq, cpuinfo_cur_freq can be 2401000 which is equal to freqs[0].It should not be rounded to 2400000. Fixes: 606a234c6d360 ("test/power: round CPU frequency to check") Cc: richael.zhuang@arm.com Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Richael Zhuang --- app/test/test_power_cpufreq.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_power_cpufreq.c b/app/test/test_power_cpufreq.c index 8516df4ca..b8fc53925 100644 --- a/app/test/test_power_cpufreq.c +++ b/app/test/test_power_cpufreq.c @@ -55,7 +55,9 @@ check_cur_freq(unsigned int lcore_id, uint32_t idx, bool turbo) FILE *f; char fullpath[PATH_MAX]; char buf[BUFSIZ]; + enum power_management_env env; uint32_t cur_freq; + uint32_t freq_conv; int ret = -1; int i; @@ -80,15 +82,18 @@ check_cur_freq(unsigned int lcore_id, uint32_t idx, bool turbo) goto fail_all; cur_freq = strtoul(buf, NULL, TEST_POWER_CONVERT_TO_DECIMAL); - - /* convert the frequency to nearest 100000 value - * Ex: if cur_freq=1396789 then freq_conv=1400000 - * Ex: if cur_freq=800030 then freq_conv=800000 - */ - unsigned int freq_conv = 0; - freq_conv = (cur_freq + TEST_FREQ_ROUNDING_DELTA) - / TEST_ROUND_FREQ_TO_N_100000; - freq_conv = freq_conv * TEST_ROUND_FREQ_TO_N_100000; + freq_conv = cur_freq; + + env = rte_power_get_env(); + if (env == PM_ENV_CPPC_CPUFREQ) { + /* convert the frequency to nearest 100000 value + * Ex: if cur_freq=1396789 then freq_conv=1400000 + * Ex: if cur_freq=800030 then freq_conv=800000 + */ + freq_conv = (cur_freq + TEST_FREQ_ROUNDING_DELTA) + / TEST_ROUND_FREQ_TO_N_100000; + freq_conv = freq_conv * TEST_ROUND_FREQ_TO_N_100000; + } if (turbo) ret = (freqs[idx] <= freq_conv ? 0 : -1); -- 2.20.1