DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: web@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] add testing requirement for new PMDs
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:30:04 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210624183004.60afaf74@sovereign> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624144513.3094257-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>

2021-06-24 15:45 (UTC+0100), Ferruh Yigit:
> As discussed in the technical board meeting
> https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-February/200012.html
> 
> This is to record that new upstreamed devices tested adequately.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> ---
> CC: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> ---
>  content/testing/_index.md | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/content/testing/_index.md b/content/testing/_index.md
> index fcdc47feca9a..3e430f8640af 100644
> --- a/content/testing/_index.md
> +++ b/content/testing/_index.md
> @@ -116,6 +116,10 @@ some validation reports are requested to the community members.
>  
>  Such release validations are sent as replies to the release announcement.
>  
> +It is not easy (or not possible at all) to test PMDs other than device vendors,

I'm not a native speaker, but is "for" missing (to do X is easy for Y)?
Suggestion: for anyone other than device vendors.

> +that is why it is expected vendors send a release validation report at least in
> +the first release that the PMD is upstreamed.
> +
>  
>  ## Tools
>  ---


  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-24 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-24 14:45 Ferruh Yigit
2021-06-24 15:30 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk [this message]
2021-06-29  8:01   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-06-29  8:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-07-01  6:49   ` Mcnamara, John
2021-07-04 15:47     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-14 15:10       ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210624183004.60afaf74@sovereign \
    --to=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=web@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).