From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99597A0547; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 17:30:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1A641104; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 17:30:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lf1-f41.google.com (mail-lf1-f41.google.com [209.85.167.41]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D843441101; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 17:30:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf1-f41.google.com with SMTP id j2so10940130lfg.9; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 08:30:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ca6YnpJq5IMK4I1MEVLXOb8pwJ6mDaF4g2X9F6vMSYM=; b=NiyHmPps6wPM5pUMxRzggISpa79+d76MH6ON5y8V+OiK7dyW9mO04T4phNSCRbOzdP L5HgyGU9Vwve8ZKxy+jWVYLcgIxkvvTAY96fsWHr1uQ38aW8KEby7PwV5GyK5Qz6Wy0K 5hlSGjJlHKn29BDgcGqfp01pCcCmY/TyQnaWJCHQVt/48ehuEtSYCwGlRJ7sw5Xchnfx TOuZzOYfYDHvcpBMMDMrNao/N1hT5VgdyB1FiFg7ryuyeEHXV0RhDIR53R1jOycUI5iY PTPp/xjVXptx1vGLg9VEFBpN6EUF3fdMqApNXPG+xMYa8nk4HWCD9S8XHwqKNFW46v3A P0yA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ca6YnpJq5IMK4I1MEVLXOb8pwJ6mDaF4g2X9F6vMSYM=; b=VM9AqZKA2xyRwLTbPWQ+r72kPjffpsu/xh1XgSSHibNXga13hpW6IeEBkRGOFDssT9 7Dw2YuYASdP4QZFAq+sgKS7w21pmDPqMqm/7rXp4sU0vle6oeDaiMyztOTG/l+Ydsn7B CnVOw3litLZZZ8tWsY0WAD/6aXfdjsP+6qqs0z0oUvCHzsOtgcRenIfpQwnLpQMVemUN W4LZgktpgJAOtjz6mgY/lNJBoBvSXJ13bAsCL+yTmt+Anf8d21f2NsUtrXb1eClbNBQI civSDP+/lfxt/ufl4TbmVMnc71tbY2KM2WR48DZIRPhr+11XOUxQqEDMBZ1ZIMuVVST2 H1rg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531tZ8xaaE9vu/8Oe6d3Drx9l8I9BaaC6yeMqpE8I1hP842QxLQp eb+eVjW5bhl3Sp8tgmUCiFU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy5RQzT9QZv762gJlQEsn2wkjoI+paHfgATV7ZFSP5S+nnx/tbszS5Q8u1PaawpJ8Y7GP4XOA== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:41cc:: with SMTP id d12mr4236106lfi.16.1624548606994; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 08:30:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sovereign (broadband-37-110-65-23.ip.moscow.rt.ru. [37.110.65.23]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d13sm319959ljc.89.2021.06.24.08.30.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 08:30:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:30:04 +0300 From: Dmitry Kozlyuk To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: web@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon , John McNamara , dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20210624183004.60afaf74@sovereign> In-Reply-To: <20210624144513.3094257-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> References: <20210624144513.3094257-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] add testing requirement for new PMDs X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2021-06-24 15:45 (UTC+0100), Ferruh Yigit: > As discussed in the technical board meeting > https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-February/200012.html > > This is to record that new upstreamed devices tested adequately. > > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit > --- > CC: John McNamara > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > --- > content/testing/_index.md | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/content/testing/_index.md b/content/testing/_index.md > index fcdc47feca9a..3e430f8640af 100644 > --- a/content/testing/_index.md > +++ b/content/testing/_index.md > @@ -116,6 +116,10 @@ some validation reports are requested to the community members. > > Such release validations are sent as replies to the release announcement. > > +It is not easy (or not possible at all) to test PMDs other than device vendors, I'm not a native speaker, but is "for" missing (to do X is easy for Y)? Suggestion: for anyone other than device vendors. > +that is why it is expected vendors send a release validation report at least in > +the first release that the PMD is upstreamed. > + > > ## Tools > ---