From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD14A0547;
	Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:44:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C8440040;
	Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:44:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-lj1-f182.google.com (mail-lj1-f182.google.com
 [209.85.208.182])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A844003C;
 Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:44:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-lj1-f182.google.com with SMTP id a16so9093679ljq.3;
 Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=ykT9bxc2SfLh5ldBZqzAPjcno98K/SWKjXfZuduN9ME=;
 b=eJO5kBE4sS7u3gUgJtcpR6UcKBSelqQ5lQR0fWgIiowfoEaFhtO2Ha5CMfcDKuJJ7W
 mrpzKEQw1EjDgHU43lE3wIVWPiNu6ZTt14utoTfmzPeMdHH5f231xVs/BAfWutTiIM8P
 fy76X7ECbCXHexjpe3yqDXHEFwdrY8d8xLrFGB3Ns5OaKNSJEPy2a5UrTGB/apRmM2fd
 A/+ycGHDmjbzPQpsDhVcfH+y/Yd+I1DMkZWLeaLazdimg0xE8XEWVWS0+TI2VJk1ELXR
 V75BPx0QxvK3j1lmR0JA1o/ywum5waIEnPi6rIiMhTyfQjUk53oP8i144KZagSQSK3s8
 S7wg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=ykT9bxc2SfLh5ldBZqzAPjcno98K/SWKjXfZuduN9ME=;
 b=jPLbw87DhFpjEjarysLAWzp0cLmfo78eL7Bj0jRUidN77d7TDGdOCC6kvRbsjliC6X
 vDzhl55xeXc3FkNYAdVR9J0edsSNEjOgUNwih+RwY3OaaZj6p+PDOfEzTKj/vaTGE2AI
 uZ7XJaaKLE3wWe4frff55aTvv6B05sVfhjGdS1XYgoX9SG9a2xnVfXCOMTttdZ33kXLE
 oz+gUBF0LJqFPEoC2/rTcggp0Yi8ymSNzmEwBpq8zOJhXxxzRv+SqyJdtvBhE984ZXlb
 gEkObxYY+/5lURo6tQLbmS2zxiiSg+jRCGnRH/B9+GDrhmihIYtzTbq57UBbnrKQB93U
 3FAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ER5daP2manTuLxmA9w+vi+tPzAgzSLHSKnW61oOONWtyQPb8O
 Ct5SAQzxxKCMhJs3DESrmUQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwjSqCoUo9Hexly09JK69lHa2IhGR7GUyxj7f7kXpLtXYfMLCAlb+yaMU9IhZ1KjwC4NZFtfA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1132:: with SMTP id
 e18mr2249157ljo.154.1624560247053; 
 Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sovereign (broadband-37-110-65-23.ip.moscow.rt.ru.
 [37.110.65.23])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m16sm318838lfl.300.2021.06.24.11.44.05
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 21:44:04 +0300
From: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
To: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Jie Zhou <jizh@linux.microsoft.com>, dev@dpdk.org, xiaoyun.li@intel.com,
 roretzla@microsoft.com, talshn@nvidia.com, pallavi.kadam@intel.com,
 thomas@monjalon.net, bruce.richardson@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com,
 konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, stable@dpdk.org
Message-ID: <20210624214404.282808cf@sovereign>
In-Reply-To: <20210624154524.GA22718@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
References: <1620236174-10676-1-git-send-email-jizh@linux.microsoft.com>
 <1620241931-28435-1-git-send-email-jizh@linux.microsoft.com>
 <1620241931-28435-10-git-send-email-jizh@linux.microsoft.com>
 <20210621023053.07b8a425@sovereign>
 <20210623212632.GD20289@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
 <20210624154524.GA22718@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v13 09/10] app/testpmd: fix unused function
 warnings
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2021-06-24 08:45 (UTC-0700), Tyler Retzlaff:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 02:26:32PM -0700, Jie Zhou wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 02:30:53AM +0300, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:  
> > > -
> > >  void
> > >  fdir_set_flex_mask(portid_t port_id, struct rte_eth_fdir_flex_mask *cfg)
> > >  {
> > > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
> > > index d61a055bdd..a40ee902e8 100644
> > > --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
> > > +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
> > > @@ -917,9 +917,7 @@ int all_ports_stopped(void);
> > >  int port_is_stopped(portid_t port_id);
> > >  int port_is_started(portid_t port_id);
> > >  void pmd_test_exit(void);
> > > -#if defined(RTE_NET_I40E) || defined(RTE_NET_IXGBE)
> > >  void fdir_get_infos(portid_t port_id);
> > > -#endif
> > >  void fdir_set_flex_mask(portid_t port_id,
> > >                            struct rte_eth_fdir_flex_mask *cfg);
> > >  void fdir_set_flex_payload(portid_t port_id,  
> > 
> > Hi Dmitry, I agree that should avoid the #ifdef as much as possible. But in this case, I am not quite sure if I followed your comment correctly. Someone originally introduced these i40e and ixgbe related fdir functions (print_fdir_mask, print_fdir_flex_payload, print_fdir_flex_mask, print_fdir_flow_type, get_fdir_info, fdir_get_infos) into testpmd with adding the #if defined(RTE_NET_I40E) || defined(RTE_NET_IXGBE) for 4 out of 6 functions and left 2 of them outside the #ifdef which caused compilation "unused function" warning. What I did here is just move the starting point of #ifdef to also include those 2 missed functions (print_fdir_mask and print_fdir_flex_payload). IMO the original author would be in better place to reducing the unneccary #ifdef in a proper way.  
> 
> i think i have to agree with jie here. there are limits to how many
> defects we should have to correct which are unrelated change. if this is
> critical i think it would be best if the maintainer provide a patch
> cleaning up the code they own.
> 
> let's not hold this patch up over it because of it being a broad change
> we lose a lot of time rebasing where either the maintainer or author
> could follow up with a narrow change to correct this.

Fair enough, the patch doesn't add technical debt at least.

Acked-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>