From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0B2A0A0C; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 18:50:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA80411A5; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 18:50:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1671A40E01 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 18:50:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1086) id 3EC1E20B7178; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 09:50:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 3EC1E20B7178 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1624985448; bh=Iuufo7WX87K8kSS+9DzjYHg/RRH1XPUEyy4DD2m7fQE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gGTY1uNQ9bQj9bxlT4z5IeHOLhEsfTzyB+rOauIbD3orJj35m82/YOnhcuRrXGesv ZfBVHG4NVGn88fg4RGC/65PmIRPkh5Ffk1afluJtIf9iavI2x9stNFoHgSC82KtwcA IQl9d0fDR/WwnTKf2/iurCfuIKG9n2U5yQn7pfwA= Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 09:50:48 -0700 From: Tyler Retzlaff To: David Marchand Cc: "Kinsella, Ray" , Thomas Monjalon , Stephen Hemminger , "Burakov, Anatoly" , dpdk-dev Message-ID: <20210629165048.GC27963@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> References: <18b5d2b7-0f9f-1098-a02b-948f7920329d@ashroe.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Experimental symbols in eal lib X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 02:14:16PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:31 PM Kinsella, Ray wrote: > > > > Hi Anatoly & Thomas, > > > > The following eal experimental symbols are present in both v21.05 and v19.11 release. These symbols should be considered for promotion to stable as part of the v22 ABI in DPDK 21.11, as they have been experimental for >= 2yrs at this point. > > Just an additional comment. > Marking stable is not the only choice. > We can also consider hiding such symbols (marking internal) if there > is no clear usecase out of DPDK. +1 there has to be a very strong/clear case for promotion to public. > > > -- > David Marchand