From: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, anatoly.burakov@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix argument to rte_bsf32_safe
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 10:15:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210719171534.GC7679@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210713201221.301248-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 01:12:21PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The first argument to rte_bsf32_safe was incorrectly declared as
> a 64 bit value. This function only correctly handles on 32 bit values
> and the underlying function rte_bsf32 only accepts 32 bit values.
> This was introduced when the safe version was added and probably cause
> by copy/paste from the 64 bit version.
there are multiple errors in this family of functions [1] both in usage
and signatures. we previously discussed rolling all fixes up into a single
patch and announcing an api break.
a doc patch was submitted as per the process documented for breaking api
but received no replies [2]
i have a full patch that corrects the whole family if you would like to
take it instead. contact me offline if you are interested.
1. http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-March/201590.html
2. http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-March/201868.html
the change stand-alone is correct so
Acked-By: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
>
> The bug passed silently under the radar until some other code was
> built with -Wall and -Wextra in C++ and C++ complains about the
> missing cast.
>
> Yes, this is a API signature change, but the original code was wrong.
> It is an inline so not an ABI change.
>
> Fixes: 4e261f551986 ("eal: add 64-bit bsf and 32-bit safe bsf functions")
> Cc: anatoly.burakov@intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> ---
> lib/eal/include/rte_common.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/eal/include/rte_common.h b/lib/eal/include/rte_common.h
> index d5a32c66a5fe..99eb5f1820ae 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/include/rte_common.h
> +++ b/lib/eal/include/rte_common.h
> @@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ rte_bsf32(uint32_t v)
> * Returns 0 if ``v`` was 0, otherwise returns 1.
> */
> static inline int
> -rte_bsf32_safe(uint64_t v, uint32_t *pos)
> +rte_bsf32_safe(uint32_t v, uint32_t *pos)
> {
> if (v == 0)
> return 0;
> --
> 2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-19 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-13 20:12 Stephen Hemminger
2021-07-19 17:15 ` Tyler Retzlaff [this message]
2021-07-19 22:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-07-20 13:26 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-23 0:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Stephen Hemminger
2021-07-23 15:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Stephen Hemminger
2021-07-24 7:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-24 23:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210719171534.GC7679@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net \
--to=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).