From: Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>
To: <jerinj@marvell.com>, <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
<thomas@monjalon.net>, Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce: make rte intr handle internal
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 21:33:52 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210802160352.135754-1-hkalra@marvell.com> (raw)
Moving struct rte_intr_handle as an internal structure to
avoid any ABI breakages in future. Since this structure defines
some static arrays and changing respective macros breaks the ABI.
Eg:
Currently RTE_MAX_RXTX_INTR_VEC_ID imposes a limit of maximum 512
MSI-X interrupts that can be defined for a PCI device, while PCI
specification allows maximum 2048 MSI-X interrupts that can be used.
If some PCI device requires more than 512 vectors, either change the
RTE_MAX_RXTX_INTR_VEC_ID limit or dynamically allocate based on
PCI device MSI-X size on probe time. Either way its an ABI breakage.
Discussion thread:
https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-March/202959.html
Change already included in 21.11 ABI improvement spreadsheet (item 42):
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1betlC000ua5SsSiJIcC54mCCCJnW6voH5Dqv9UxeyfE/edit#gid=0
Signed-off-by: Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>
---
doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
index d9c0e65921..e95574b1ec 100644
--- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ Deprecation Notices
* eal: The function ``rte_eal_remote_launch`` will return new error codes
after read or write error on the pipe, instead of calling ``rte_panic``.
+* eal: Making ``struct rte_intr_handle`` internal to avoid any ABI breakages
+ in future.
+
* rte_atomicNN_xxx: These APIs do not take memory order parameter. This does
not allow for writing optimized code for all the CPU architectures supported
in DPDK. DPDK has adopted the atomic operations from
--
2.18.0
next reply other threads:[~2021-08-02 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-02 16:03 Harman Kalra [this message]
2021-08-02 19:20 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-08-03 2:37 ` Xia, Chenbo
2021-08-03 4:05 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-08-04 14:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210802160352.135754-1-hkalra@marvell.com \
--to=hkalra@marvell.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).