From: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
To: david.marchand@redhat.com, anatoly.burakov@intel.com,
olivier.matz@6wind.com, andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru,
yipeng1.wang@intel.com, sameh.gobriel@intel.com,
bruce.richardson@intel.com, vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com,
konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com,
ruifeng.wang@arm.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, nd@arm.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/func_reentrancy: free memzones after creating test
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 21:57:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210823025740.11828-1-joyce.kong@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210728073322.27011-1-joyce.kong@arm.com>
Function reentrancy test limits maximum number of iterations
simultaneously, however it doesn't free the 'fr_test_once'
memzones after the fact, so introduce freeing 'fr_test_once'
in ring/mempool/hash/fbk/lpm_clean.
Meanwhile, add the missing free for test case on main thread.
Fixes: 104a92bd026f ("app: add reentrancy tests")
Fixes: 995eec619024 ("test: clean up memory for function reentrancy test")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
---
v3/v4:
Add the synchronization between the main lcore and worker
lcores to ensure lcores to free "common object" after all
func callback finished. <David Marchand>
v2:
Add the discription about adding missing frees for the
main thread in the commit log. <Olivier Matz>
v1:
The initial version.
---
app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c b/app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c
index 231c99a9eb..6bb46c6130 100644
--- a/app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c
+++ b/app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c
@@ -89,6 +89,10 @@ ring_clean(unsigned int lcore_id)
char ring_name[MAX_STRING_SIZE];
int i;
+ rp = rte_ring_lookup("fr_test_once");
+ if (rp != NULL)
+ rte_ring_free(rp);
+
for (i = 0; i < MAX_ITER_MULTI; i++) {
snprintf(ring_name, sizeof(ring_name),
"fr_test_%d_%d", lcore_id, i);
@@ -148,7 +152,10 @@ mempool_clean(unsigned int lcore_id)
char mempool_name[MAX_STRING_SIZE];
int i;
- /* verify all ring created successful */
+ mp = rte_mempool_lookup("fr_test_once");
+ if (mp != NULL)
+ rte_mempool_free(mp);
+
for (i = 0; i < MAX_ITER_MULTI; i++) {
snprintf(mempool_name, sizeof(mempool_name), "fr_test_%d_%d",
lcore_id, i);
@@ -208,6 +215,10 @@ hash_clean(unsigned lcore_id)
struct rte_hash *handle;
int i;
+ handle = rte_hash_find_existing("fr_test_once");
+ if (handle != NULL)
+ rte_hash_free(handle);
+
for (i = 0; i < MAX_ITER_MULTI; i++) {
snprintf(hash_name, sizeof(hash_name), "fr_test_%d_%d", lcore_id, i);
@@ -272,6 +283,10 @@ fbk_clean(unsigned lcore_id)
struct rte_fbk_hash_table *handle;
int i;
+ handle = rte_fbk_hash_find_existing("fr_test_once");
+ if (handle != NULL)
+ rte_fbk_hash_free(handle);
+
for (i = 0; i < MAX_ITER_MULTI; i++) {
snprintf(fbk_name, sizeof(fbk_name), "fr_test_%d_%d", lcore_id, i);
@@ -338,6 +353,10 @@ lpm_clean(unsigned int lcore_id)
struct rte_lpm *lpm;
int i;
+ lpm = rte_lpm_find_existing("fr_test_once");
+ if (lpm != NULL)
+ rte_lpm_free(lpm);
+
for (i = 0; i < MAX_LPM_ITER_TIMES; i++) {
snprintf(lpm_name, sizeof(lpm_name), "fr_test_%d_%d", lcore_id, i);
@@ -420,8 +439,7 @@ launch_test(struct test_case *pt_case)
{
int ret = 0;
unsigned lcore_id;
- unsigned cores_save = rte_lcore_count();
- unsigned cores = RTE_MIN(cores_save, MAX_LCORES);
+ unsigned cores = RTE_MIN(rte_lcore_count(), MAX_LCORES);
unsigned count;
if (pt_case->func == NULL)
@@ -442,14 +460,12 @@ launch_test(struct test_case *pt_case)
if (pt_case->func(pt_case->arg) < 0)
ret = -1;
- cores = cores_save;
RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_WORKER(lcore_id) {
- if (cores == 1)
- break;
- cores--;
if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(lcore_id) < 0)
ret = -1;
+ }
+ RTE_LCORE_FOREACH(lcore_id) {
if (pt_case->clean != NULL)
pt_case->clean(lcore_id);
}
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-23 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-28 7:33 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test/func_reentrancy: free memzones after creating test case Joyce Kong
2021-07-30 11:27 ` Olivier Matz
2021-07-31 8:42 ` Joyce Kong
2021-07-31 12:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Joyce Kong
2021-08-17 8:17 ` David Marchand
2021-08-20 7:57 ` Joyce Kong
2021-08-20 8:52 ` David Marchand
2021-08-23 2:25 ` Joyce Kong
2021-08-20 8:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] test/func_reentrancy: free memzones after creating test Joyce Kong
2021-08-23 2:57 ` Joyce Kong [this message]
2021-09-16 15:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Olivier Matz
2021-09-16 15:09 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210823025740.11828-1-joyce.kong@arm.com \
--to=joyce.kong@arm.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
--cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).