From: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@cesnet.cz>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: "Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Ori Kam" <orika@nvidia.com>,
"Andrew Rybchenko" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
"Havlík Martin" <xhavli56@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>,
dev@dpdk.org, "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>,
"Matan Azrad" <matan@nvidia.com>, Chas3 <chas3@att.com>,
"Slava Ovsiienko" <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/bonding: start ethdev prior to setting 8023ad flow
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:15:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210826121505.55de1254@coaster.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e6911de-c979-52bd-bdd1-763d3d7a2e7c@intel.com>
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 14:18:16 +0100
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:
> On 7/15/2021 2:58 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 14/07/2021 17:00, Jan Viktorin:
> >>>> On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 12:26:35 +0300
> >>>> Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> This matters for the bonding case as well, doesn't it?.
> >>>>>>>>>> It is not desirable to accidently omit a packet that was
> >>>>>>>>>> received by primary ingress logic instead of being
> >>>>>>>>>> redirected into the dedicated queue.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Are there any chances that for mlx5 it would be possible
> >>>>>>>>>> to insert flow rules before calling rte_eth_dev_start?
> >>>>>>>>>> Anyway, the behaviour should be specified and documented
> >>>>>>>>>> in DPDK more precisely to avoid such uncertainty in the
> >>>>>>>>>> future.
> >>>>>>>>> I agree the documentation should be fixed.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cc Thomas and Ferruh since ethdev documentation should be
> >>>>> clarified.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It looks like there is no consensus if the patch is a right
> >>>>> direction or wrong. For me it looks wrong taking all above
> >>>>> arguments in to account (mainly necessity to be able to insert
> >>>>> flows before pushing start button which enables the traffic if
> >>>>> HW supports it).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So, I'm applying first two patches and hold on this one.
> >>
> >> Andrew, I believe that it would be helpful to start some new thread
> >> otherwise we would get lost here :). It seems that we will have few
> >> more fixes for the bonding driver. Do you prefer an entirely new
> >> patchset or v2 of this topic? Or any other advise how to proceed?
> >
> > This thread is about 3 things:
> > - bonding issue
> > - ethdev doc
> > - mlx5 design
> > That's too much topics to address in one thread :)
> >
> > You may restart the discussion with a doc update
> > if the stop/start requirement is not clear.
> >
> >
>
> Is separate discussions created as follow up?
>
Martin is recently unavailable. But he has already started a new
thread for _ethdev doc_ topic:
[PATCH 0/4] doc: update RTE flow rule and bonding related info
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@dpdk.org/msg214517.html
to first clarify/document what is the current status and how to proceed.
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-26 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-22 9:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] net/bonding: make dedicated queues work with mlx5 Martin Havlik
2021-06-22 9:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/bonding: fix proper return value check and correct log message Martin Havlik
2021-07-08 12:33 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-07-13 9:26 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-06-22 9:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/bonding: fix not checked return value Martin Havlik
2021-07-08 12:43 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-07-08 13:20 ` Havlík Martin
2021-07-09 0:09 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-07-13 9:26 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-06-22 9:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/bonding: start ethdev prior to setting 8023ad flow Martin Havlik
2021-06-23 7:04 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-06-24 11:57 ` Havlík Martin
2021-07-04 15:18 ` Matan Azrad
2021-07-07 15:54 ` Jan Viktorin
2021-07-11 8:49 ` Ori Kam
2021-07-11 21:45 ` Jan Viktorin
2021-07-12 13:07 ` Ori Kam
2021-07-13 8:18 ` Havlík Martin
2021-07-13 9:26 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-13 11:06 ` Jan Viktorin
2021-07-13 17:17 ` Ori Kam
2021-07-14 15:00 ` Jan Viktorin
2021-07-15 13:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-08-24 13:18 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-08-26 10:15 ` Jan Viktorin [this message]
2021-07-04 15:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] net/bonding: make dedicated queues work with mlx5 Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-25 6:15 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/bonding: start ethdev prior to setting 8023ad flow Havlík Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210826121505.55de1254@coaster.localdomain \
--to=viktorin@cesnet.cz \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=chas3@att.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=humin29@huawei.com \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
--cc=xhavli56@stud.fit.vutbr.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).