From: Michael Baum <michaelba@nvidia.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>,
Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>,
Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>, <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/6] common/mlx5: fix resource cleanliness in a device remove
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 23:37:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210831203732.3411134-7-michaelba@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210831203732.3411134-1-michaelba@nvidia.com>
The common remove function call in a loop to remove function for each
driver which have been registered.
If all removes are succeeded, it return 0 without to free the device
which allocated in probe function. Otherwise, it free the device.
In fact we expect exactly the opposite behavior. If all removes are
failed, it return error without to free the device which allocated in
probe function. Otherwise, it free the device and return 0.
Replace it with the correct behavior.
Fixes: 8a41f4deccc3 ("common/mlx5: introduce layer for multiple class drivers")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Michael Baum <michaelba@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/common/mlx5/mlx5_common.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/common/mlx5/mlx5_common.c b/drivers/common/mlx5/mlx5_common.c
index 4321cb3a9c..6885bbb1d2 100644
--- a/drivers/common/mlx5/mlx5_common.c
+++ b/drivers/common/mlx5/mlx5_common.c
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ mlx5_common_dev_remove(struct rte_device *eal_dev)
return -ENODEV;
/* Matching device found, cleanup and unload drivers. */
ret = drivers_remove(dev, dev->classes_loaded);
- if (ret != 0)
+ if (ret == 0)
dev_release(dev);
return ret;
}
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-31 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-31 20:37 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] mlx5: some independent fixes Michael Baum
2021-08-31 20:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] net/mlx5: fix shared device context creation error flow Michael Baum
2021-09-05 8:46 ` Raslan Darawsheh
2021-08-31 20:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/6] net/mlx5: fix PCI probing " Michael Baum
2021-09-05 8:53 ` Raslan Darawsheh
2021-08-31 20:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/6] net/mlx5: fix allow duplicate pattern devarg default Michael Baum
2021-08-31 20:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/6] common/mlx5: fix class combination validation Michael Baum
2021-08-31 20:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/6] common/mlx5: fix device list operation concurrency Michael Baum
2021-08-31 20:37 ` Michael Baum [this message]
2021-09-01 7:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] mlx5: some independent fixes Matan Azrad
2021-09-12 10:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Michael Baum
2021-09-12 10:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] net/mlx5: fix memory leak in the SH creation Michael Baum
2021-09-12 10:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] net/mlx5: fix memory leak in PCI probe Michael Baum
2021-09-12 10:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] net/mlx5: fix allow duplicate pattern devarg default Michael Baum
2021-09-12 10:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] common/mlx5: fix class combination validation Michael Baum
2021-09-12 10:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] common/mlx5: fix device list operation concurrency Michael Baum
2021-09-12 10:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] common/mlx5: fix resource cleanliness in a device remove Michael Baum
2021-09-20 21:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] mlx5: some independent fixes Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210831203732.3411134-7-michaelba@nvidia.com \
--to=michaelba@nvidia.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).