From: Gaoxiang Liu <gaoxiangliu0@163.com>
To: maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, chenbo.xia@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, liugaoxiang@huawei.com,
Gaoxiang Liu <gaoxiangliu0@163.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/vhost: merge vhost stats loop in vhost Tx/Rx
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 09:43:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210928014348.1747-1-gaoxiangliu0@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210927013022.131-1-gaoxiangliu0@163.com>
To improve performance in vhost Tx/Rx, merge vhost stats loop.
eth_vhost_tx has 2 loop of send num iteraion.
It can be merge into one.
eth_vhost_rx has the same issue as Tx.
Fixes: 4d6cf2ac93dc ("net/vhost: add extended statistics")
Signed-off-by: Gaoxiang Liu <gaoxiangliu0@163.com>
---
v2:
* Fix coding style issues.
---
drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c | 62 ++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c b/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
index a202931e9a..a4129980f2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
@@ -336,38 +336,29 @@ vhost_count_xcast_packets(struct vhost_queue *vq,
}
static void
-vhost_update_packet_xstats(struct vhost_queue *vq, struct rte_mbuf **bufs,
- uint16_t count, uint64_t nb_bytes,
- uint64_t nb_missed)
+vhost_update_single_packet_xstats(struct vhost_queue *vq, struct rte_mbuf *buf)
{
uint32_t pkt_len = 0;
- uint64_t i = 0;
uint64_t index;
struct vhost_stats *pstats = &vq->stats;
- pstats->xstats[VHOST_BYTE] += nb_bytes;
- pstats->xstats[VHOST_MISSED_PKT] += nb_missed;
- pstats->xstats[VHOST_UNICAST_PKT] += nb_missed;
-
- for (i = 0; i < count ; i++) {
- pstats->xstats[VHOST_PKT]++;
- pkt_len = bufs[i]->pkt_len;
- if (pkt_len == 64) {
- pstats->xstats[VHOST_64_PKT]++;
- } else if (pkt_len > 64 && pkt_len < 1024) {
- index = (sizeof(pkt_len) * 8)
- - __builtin_clz(pkt_len) - 5;
- pstats->xstats[index]++;
- } else {
- if (pkt_len < 64)
- pstats->xstats[VHOST_UNDERSIZE_PKT]++;
- else if (pkt_len <= 1522)
- pstats->xstats[VHOST_1024_TO_1522_PKT]++;
- else if (pkt_len > 1522)
- pstats->xstats[VHOST_1523_TO_MAX_PKT]++;
- }
- vhost_count_xcast_packets(vq, bufs[i]);
+ pstats->xstats[VHOST_PKT]++;
+ pkt_len = buf->pkt_len;
+ if (pkt_len == 64) {
+ pstats->xstats[VHOST_64_PKT]++;
+ } else if (pkt_len > 64 && pkt_len < 1024) {
+ index = (sizeof(pkt_len) * 8)
+ - __builtin_clz(pkt_len) - 5;
+ pstats->xstats[index]++;
+ } else {
+ if (pkt_len < 64)
+ pstats->xstats[VHOST_UNDERSIZE_PKT]++;
+ else if (pkt_len <= 1522)
+ pstats->xstats[VHOST_1024_TO_1522_PKT]++;
+ else if (pkt_len > 1522)
+ pstats->xstats[VHOST_1523_TO_MAX_PKT]++;
}
+ vhost_count_xcast_packets(vq, buf);
}
static uint16_t
@@ -376,7 +367,6 @@ eth_vhost_rx(void *q, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_bufs)
struct vhost_queue *r = q;
uint16_t i, nb_rx = 0;
uint16_t nb_receive = nb_bufs;
- uint64_t nb_bytes = 0;
if (unlikely(rte_atomic32_read(&r->allow_queuing) == 0))
return 0;
@@ -411,11 +401,11 @@ eth_vhost_rx(void *q, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_bufs)
if (r->internal->vlan_strip)
rte_vlan_strip(bufs[i]);
- nb_bytes += bufs[i]->pkt_len;
- }
+ r->stats.bytes += bufs[i]->pkt_len;
+ r->stats.xstats[VHOST_BYTE] += bufs[i]->pkt_len;
- r->stats.bytes += nb_bytes;
- vhost_update_packet_xstats(r, bufs, nb_rx, nb_bytes, 0);
+ vhost_update_single_packet_xstats(r, bufs[i]);
+ }
out:
rte_atomic32_set(&r->while_queuing, 0);
@@ -471,16 +461,20 @@ eth_vhost_tx(void *q, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_bufs)
break;
}
- for (i = 0; likely(i < nb_tx); i++)
+ for (i = 0; likely(i < nb_tx); i++) {
nb_bytes += bufs[i]->pkt_len;
+ vhost_update_single_packet_xstats(r, bufs[i]);
+ }
nb_missed = nb_bufs - nb_tx;
r->stats.pkts += nb_tx;
r->stats.bytes += nb_bytes;
- r->stats.missed_pkts += nb_bufs - nb_tx;
+ r->stats.missed_pkts += nb_missed;
- vhost_update_packet_xstats(r, bufs, nb_tx, nb_bytes, nb_missed);
+ r->stats.xstats[VHOST_BYTE] += nb_bytes;
+ r->stats.xstats[VHOST_MISSED_PKT] += nb_missed;
+ r->stats.xstats[VHOST_UNICAST_PKT] += nb_missed;
/* According to RFC2863, ifHCOutUcastPkts, ifHCOutMulticastPkts and
* ifHCOutBroadcastPkts counters are increased when packets are not
--
2.32.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-28 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-26 12:56 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Gaoxiang Liu
2021-09-27 1:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Gaoxiang Liu
2021-09-28 1:43 ` Gaoxiang Liu [this message]
2021-10-06 10:42 ` Gaoxiang Liu
2021-10-15 12:16 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-16 8:59 ` Gaoxiang Liu
2021-10-17 23:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Gaoxiang Liu
2021-10-21 10:04 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-21 12:34 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-21 18:56 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-22 1:35 ` Gaoxiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210928014348.1747-1-gaoxiangliu0@163.com \
--to=gaoxiangliu0@163.com \
--cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=liugaoxiang@huawei.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).