From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Ivan Ilchenko <ivan.ilchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/11] net/sfc: prepare having no some SW stats on an adapter
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 14:29:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210928112912.785412-8-andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210928112912.785412-1-andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
From: Ivan Ilchenko <ivan.ilchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Global description structure of SW stats is used currently.
Following patches introduce SW stats that may be unavailable
for some adapters, so add per-adapter descriptions to safely
work with multiple adapters.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Ilchenko <ivan.ilchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
---
drivers/net/sfc/sfc.h | 7 ++++
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_sw_stats.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc.h b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc.h
index b9ff8baed2..5a40a73c7f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc.h
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc.h
@@ -217,9 +217,16 @@ struct sfc_counter_rxq {
struct rte_mempool *mp;
};
+struct sfc_sw_stat_data {
+ const struct sfc_sw_stat_descr *descr;
+};
+
struct sfc_sw_stats {
/* Number extended statistics provided by SW stats */
unsigned int xstats_count;
+ /* Supported SW statistics */
+ struct sfc_sw_stat_data *supp;
+ unsigned int supp_count;
uint64_t *reset_vals;
rte_spinlock_t queues_bitmap_lock;
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_sw_stats.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_sw_stats.c
index 0f93091500..a9ab29064a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_sw_stats.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_sw_stats.c
@@ -341,6 +341,7 @@ sfc_sw_xstats_get_vals(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
unsigned int *nb_supported)
{
uint64_t *reset_vals = sa->sw_stats.reset_vals;
+ struct sfc_sw_stats *sw_stats = &sa->sw_stats;
unsigned int sw_xstats_offset;
unsigned int i;
@@ -348,8 +349,8 @@ sfc_sw_xstats_get_vals(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
sw_xstats_offset = *nb_supported;
- for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(sfc_sw_stats_descr); i++) {
- sfc_sw_xstat_get_values(sa, &sfc_sw_stats_descr[i], xstats,
+ for (i = 0; i < sw_stats->xstats_count; i++) {
+ sfc_sw_xstat_get_values(sa, sw_stats->supp[i].descr, xstats,
xstats_count, nb_written, nb_supported);
}
@@ -366,13 +367,14 @@ sfc_sw_xstats_get_names(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
unsigned int *nb_written,
unsigned int *nb_supported)
{
+ struct sfc_sw_stats *sw_stats = &sa->sw_stats;
unsigned int i;
int ret;
sfc_adapter_lock(sa);
- for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(sfc_sw_stats_descr); i++) {
- ret = sfc_sw_stat_get_names(sa, &sfc_sw_stats_descr[i],
+ for (i = 0; i < sw_stats->supp_count; i++) {
+ ret = sfc_sw_stat_get_names(sa, sw_stats->supp[i].descr,
xstats_names, xstats_count,
nb_written, nb_supported);
if (ret != 0) {
@@ -394,6 +396,7 @@ sfc_sw_xstats_get_vals_by_id(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
unsigned int *nb_supported)
{
uint64_t *reset_vals = sa->sw_stats.reset_vals;
+ struct sfc_sw_stats *sw_stats = &sa->sw_stats;
unsigned int sw_xstats_offset;
unsigned int i;
@@ -401,8 +404,8 @@ sfc_sw_xstats_get_vals_by_id(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
sw_xstats_offset = *nb_supported;
- for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(sfc_sw_stats_descr); i++) {
- sfc_sw_xstat_get_values_by_id(sa, &sfc_sw_stats_descr[i], ids,
+ for (i = 0; i < sw_stats->supp_count; i++) {
+ sfc_sw_xstat_get_values_by_id(sa, sw_stats->supp[i].descr, ids,
values, n, nb_supported);
}
@@ -421,13 +424,14 @@ sfc_sw_xstats_get_names_by_id(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
unsigned int size,
unsigned int *nb_supported)
{
+ struct sfc_sw_stats *sw_stats = &sa->sw_stats;
unsigned int i;
int ret;
sfc_adapter_lock(sa);
- for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(sfc_sw_stats_descr); i++) {
- ret = sfc_sw_xstat_get_names_by_id(sa, &sfc_sw_stats_descr[i],
+ for (i = 0; i < sw_stats->supp_count; i++) {
+ ret = sfc_sw_xstat_get_names_by_id(sa, sw_stats->supp[i].descr,
ids, xstats_names, size,
nb_supported);
if (ret != 0) {
@@ -475,15 +479,15 @@ void
sfc_sw_xstats_reset(struct sfc_adapter *sa)
{
uint64_t *reset_vals = sa->sw_stats.reset_vals;
- const struct sfc_sw_stat_descr *sw_stat;
+ struct sfc_sw_stats *sw_stats = &sa->sw_stats;
unsigned int i;
SFC_ASSERT(sfc_adapter_is_locked(sa));
- for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(sfc_sw_stats_descr); i++) {
- sw_stat = &sfc_sw_stats_descr[i];
- sfc_sw_xstat_reset(sa, sw_stat, reset_vals);
- reset_vals += sfc_sw_xstat_get_nb_supported(sa, sw_stat);
+ for (i = 0; i < sw_stats->supp_count; i++) {
+ sfc_sw_xstat_reset(sa, sw_stats->supp[i].descr, reset_vals);
+ reset_vals += sfc_sw_xstat_get_nb_supported(sa,
+ sw_stats->supp[i].descr);
}
}
@@ -491,22 +495,44 @@ int
sfc_sw_xstats_configure(struct sfc_adapter *sa)
{
uint64_t **reset_vals = &sa->sw_stats.reset_vals;
+ struct sfc_sw_stats *sw_stats = &sa->sw_stats;
size_t nb_supported = 0;
unsigned int i;
+ int rc;
+
+ sw_stats->supp_count = RTE_DIM(sfc_sw_stats_descr);
+ if (sw_stats->supp == NULL) {
+ sw_stats->supp = rte_malloc(NULL, sw_stats->supp_count *
+ sizeof(*sw_stats->supp), 0);
+ if (sw_stats->supp == NULL)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ for (i = 0; i < sw_stats->supp_count; i++)
+ sw_stats->supp[i].descr = &sfc_sw_stats_descr[i];
- for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(sfc_sw_stats_descr); i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < sw_stats->supp_count; i++)
nb_supported += sfc_sw_xstat_get_nb_supported(sa,
- &sfc_sw_stats_descr[i]);
+ sw_stats->supp[i].descr);
sa->sw_stats.xstats_count = nb_supported;
*reset_vals = rte_realloc(*reset_vals,
nb_supported * sizeof(**reset_vals), 0);
- if (*reset_vals == NULL)
- return ENOMEM;
+ if (*reset_vals == NULL) {
+ rc = -ENOMEM;
+ goto fail_reset_vals;
+ }
memset(*reset_vals, 0, nb_supported * sizeof(**reset_vals));
return 0;
+
+fail_reset_vals:
+ sa->sw_stats.xstats_count = 0;
+ rte_free(sw_stats->supp);
+ sw_stats->supp = NULL;
+ sw_stats->supp_count = 0;
+
+ return rc;
}
static void
@@ -552,6 +578,8 @@ int
sfc_sw_xstats_init(struct sfc_adapter *sa)
{
sa->sw_stats.xstats_count = 0;
+ sa->sw_stats.supp = NULL;
+ sa->sw_stats.supp_count = 0;
sa->sw_stats.reset_vals = NULL;
return sfc_sw_xstats_alloc_queues_bitmap(sa);
@@ -563,5 +591,8 @@ sfc_sw_xstats_close(struct sfc_adapter *sa)
sfc_sw_xstats_free_queues_bitmap(sa);
rte_free(sa->sw_stats.reset_vals);
sa->sw_stats.reset_vals = NULL;
+ rte_free(sa->sw_stats.supp);
+ sa->sw_stats.supp = NULL;
+ sa->sw_stats.supp_count = 0;
sa->sw_stats.xstats_count = 0;
}
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-28 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-28 11:29 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/11] net/sfc: support per-queue stats on EF100 Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-28 11:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/11] net/sfc: rename array of SW stats descriptions Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-28 11:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/11] net/sfc: rename accumulative SW stats to total Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-28 11:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/11] net/sfc: rename SW stats structures Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-28 11:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/11] net/sfc: fix cleanup order of SW stats Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-28 11:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/11] net/sfc: fix missing const of SW stats descriptions Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-28 11:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/11] net/sfc: optimize getting number of SW stats Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-28 11:29 ` Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2021-09-28 11:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/11] net/sfc: add toggle to disable total stat Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-28 11:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/11] net/sfc: add support for SW stats groups Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-28 11:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/11] net/sfc: collect per queue stats in EF100 Rx datapath Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-28 11:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 11/11] net/sfc: collect per queue stats in EF100 Tx datapath Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-11 16:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/11] net/sfc: support per-queue stats on EF100 Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210928112912.785412-8-andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--to=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ivan.ilchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).